Nikolay Zafirov
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Plant Science
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Paolo CherubiniIgnacio García‐GonzálezAchim BräuningMomchil PanayotovHolger GärtnerMartín de LuisJoana VieiraCristina Nabais
- Topics
- Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers)Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsFrontiers in Plant Science
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesBulgaria
In The Last Decade
Nikolay Zafirov
8 papers receiving 211 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Atmospheric Science 192
- Global and Planetary Change 182
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 113
- Plant Science 29
- Ecology 16
Countries citing papers authored by Nikolay Zafirov
This map shows the geographic impact of Nikolay Zafirov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nikolay Zafirov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nikolay Zafirov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nikolay Zafirov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nikolay Zafirov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nikolay Zafirov. The network helps show where Nikolay Zafirov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nikolay Zafirov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nikolay Zafirov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nikolay Zafirov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nikolay Zafirov. Nikolay Zafirov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 75 | |
| 5 | 78 | |
| 6 | Structure and function of intra-annual density fluctuations | 1 |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | Chronology of tree ring series of Fagus sylvatica L. on Berkovitsa state forest enterprise western Balkan range. | 1 |
About Nikolay Zafirov
Nikolay Zafirov is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 8 papers that have together received 217 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (192 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (113 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (182 citations). Nikolay Zafirov has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Paolo Cherubini, Ignacio García‐González, Achim Bräuning, Momchil Panayotov, Holger Gärtner, Martín de Luis, Joana Vieira, Cristina Nabais, Giovanna Battipaglia and Katarina Čufar. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Plant Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.