Nigel S. King

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Nigel S. King is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nigel S. King has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Epidemiology, 13 papers in Emergency Medicine and 12 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Nigel S. King's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (12 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers). Nigel S. King is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (12 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers). Nigel S. King collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Nigel S. King's co-authors include F J Wenden, Derick T Wade, Sue E. Crawford, Nicola Moss, Frances Caldwell, Paul Kennedy and Andy Tyerman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Journal of Neurology and Clinical Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Nigel S. King

18 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a m... 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nigel S. King United Kingdom 14 1.9k 1.2k 1.1k 373 194 19 2.1k
F J Wenden United Kingdom 7 1.5k 0.8× 1.0k 0.9× 947 0.8× 206 0.6× 165 0.9× 7 1.7k
Chris Paniak Canada 14 1.6k 0.8× 1.1k 0.9× 1.1k 1.0× 227 0.6× 127 0.7× 23 1.7k
Carolyn Curran Australia 10 1.7k 0.9× 909 0.8× 1.1k 1.0× 256 0.7× 262 1.4× 11 1.9k
Brian Ivins United States 22 1.8k 0.9× 1.0k 0.9× 1.1k 1.0× 687 1.8× 185 1.0× 46 2.3k
Nicola Moss United Kingdom 7 1.2k 0.6× 762 0.6× 716 0.6× 172 0.5× 143 0.7× 9 1.4k
Jamie Pardini United States 13 2.3k 1.2× 1.3k 1.1× 1.4k 1.2× 245 0.7× 203 1.0× 26 2.5k
Nicole von Steinbüechel Germany 18 1.4k 0.7× 847 0.7× 934 0.8× 233 0.6× 218 1.1× 46 1.7k
Catherine Willmott Australia 17 1.4k 0.7× 814 0.7× 873 0.8× 156 0.4× 223 1.1× 48 1.7k
Rosemarie Scolaro Moser United States 21 1.6k 0.8× 786 0.7× 1.1k 1.0× 204 0.5× 156 0.8× 43 1.8k
Karen M. Johnston Canada 16 1.7k 0.9× 888 0.8× 968 0.9× 159 0.4× 138 0.7× 22 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel S. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel S. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel S. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel S. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel S. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel S. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel S. King. The network helps show where Nigel S. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel S. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel S. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel S. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel S. King. Nigel S. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
King, Nigel S., et al.. (2021). Mixed messages from the ‘Mild Traumatic Brain Injury’ and ‘Sport-related Concussion’ literatures: Clinical implications. Brain Injury. 35(4). 501–503. 2 indexed citations
2.
King, Nigel S.. (2019). ‘Mild Traumatic Brain Injury’ and ‘Sport-related Concussion’: Different languages and mixed messages?. Brain Injury. 33(12). 1556–1563. 12 indexed citations
3.
King, Nigel S.. (2015). Providing Psychotherapy to People with Neuropsychological Impairment: Complexities and Issues Raised by the Case of "Judith". Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy. 11(1). 21–25. 1 indexed citations
4.
King, Nigel S.. (2014). A systematic review of age and gender factors in prolonged post-concussion symptoms after mild head injury. Brain Injury. 28(13-14). 1639–1645. 64 indexed citations
5.
King, Nigel S., et al.. (2013). The Nature of Permanent Post-concussion Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Brain Impairment. 14(2). 235–242. 13 indexed citations
6.
King, Nigel S., et al.. (2011). Permanent post-concussion symptoms after mild head injury. Brain Injury. 25(5). 462–470. 107 indexed citations
7.
Tyerman, Andy & Nigel S. King. (2008). Psychological Approaches to Rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury. 8 indexed citations
8.
King, Nigel S.. (2008). PTSD and traumatic brain injury: Folklore and fact?. Brain Injury. 22(1). 1–5. 63 indexed citations
9.
Kennedy, Paul, et al.. (2006). The Role of Negative Cognitive Appraisals in PTSD Symptoms Following Spinal Cord Injuries. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 34(4). 437–452. 47 indexed citations
11.
King, Nigel S.. (2001). “AFFECT WITHOUT RECOLLECTION” IN POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER WHERE HEAD INJURY CAUSES ORGANIC AMNESIA FOR THE EVENT. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 29(4). 501–504. 5 indexed citations
12.
King, Nigel S., et al.. (1999). Early prediction of persisting post‐concussion symptoms following mild and moderate head injuries. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 38(1). 15–25. 75 indexed citations
13.
Wade, Derick T, Nigel S. King, F J Wenden, Sue E. Crawford, & Frances Caldwell. (1998). Routine follow up after head injury: a second randomised controlled trial. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 65(2). 177–183. 209 indexed citations
14.
Wenden, F J, Sue E. Crawford, Derick T Wade, Nigel S. King, & Nicola Moss. (1998). Assault, post-traumatic amnesia and other variables related to outcome following head injury. Clinical Rehabilitation. 12(1). 53–63. 26 indexed citations
15.
King, Nigel S.. (1997). Post-traumatic stress disorder and head injury as a dual diagnosis: "islands" of memory as a mechanism.. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 62(1). 82–84. 40 indexed citations
16.
King, Nigel S., Sue E. Crawford, F J Wenden, et al.. (1997). Measurement of post-traumatic amnesia: how reliable is it?. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 62(1). 38–42. 84 indexed citations
17.
Wade, Derick T, Sue E. Crawford, F J Wenden, Nigel S. King, & Nicola Moss. (1997). Does routine follow up after head injury help? A randomised controlled trial.. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 62(5). 478–484. 102 indexed citations
18.
King, Nigel S.. (1996). Emotional, neuropsychological, and organic factors: their use in the prediction of persisting postconcussion symptoms after moderate and mild head injuries.. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 61(1). 75–81. 138 indexed citations
19.
King, Nigel S., Sue E. Crawford, F J Wenden, Nicola Moss, & Derick T Wade. (1995). The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. Journal of Neurology. 242(9). 587–592. 1067 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026