Nigel Meeks

1.7k total citations
40 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Nigel Meeks is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nigel Meeks has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Archeology, 13 papers in Paleontology and 8 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Nigel Meeks's work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (13 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (11 papers) and Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (6 papers). Nigel Meeks is often cited by papers focused on Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (13 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (11 papers) and Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (6 papers). Nigel Meeks collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Nigel Meeks's co-authors include Ian C. Freestone, Margaret Sax, Paul Craddock, Catherine Higgitt, Richard Burleigh, M. S. TITE, Andrew Middleton, W. A. Oddy, G. de G. Sieveking and John McNabb and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Archaeological Science.

In The Last Decade

Nigel Meeks

36 papers receiving 983 citations

Peers

Nigel Meeks
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Archeology 536
  • Paleontology 378
  • Materials Chemistry 184
  • Archeology 169
  • Anthropology 155
Replace Sana Shilstein with:
Sana Shilstein Israel
Linda C. Prinsloo South Africa
Céline Paris France
Colette Vignaud France
Heather Lechtman United States
Anders G. Nord Sweden
Ivana Angelini Italy
Izumi Shimada United States
Loïc Bertrand France
Ina Reiche France
Sana Shilstein Israel View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Nigel Meeks
Nigel Meeks · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Nigel Meeks
Nigel Meeks · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Meeks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Meeks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Meeks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Meeks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Meeks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Meeks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Meeks. The network helps show where Nigel Meeks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel Meeks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel Meeks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel Meeks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel Meeks. Nigel Meeks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2
Precision Lost Wax Casting
1
3
The Braganza Fibula. Scientific investigation and technology
0
4 17
5 282
6 34
7
The Tjitsma (Wijnaldum) die: a 7th century tool for making a cross- hatched pattern on gold foil, or a master template?
1
8 10
9
Pre-hispanic goldwork in the British Museum: some recent technological studies
1
10 17
11 20
12 1
13 7
14 2
15 77
16
Technological studies of ancient ceramics from the Near East, Aegean, and Southeast Europe
15
17 28
18 7
19 41
20 74

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026