Nigel Key

4.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
91 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

Nigel Key is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nigel Key has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 55 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and 26 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Nigel Key's work include Agricultural Economics and Policy (49 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (39 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (20 papers). Nigel Key is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Economics and Policy (49 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (39 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (20 papers). Nigel Key collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Nigel Key's co-authors include David Runsten, Alain de Janvry, Élisabeth Sadoulet, Michael J. Roberts, William D. McBride, Stacy Sneeringer, Jeremy G. Weber, Erik J. O’Donoghue, James M. MacDonald and Mary Clare Ahearn and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, World Development and Climatic Change.

In The Last Decade

Nigel Key

86 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

Transactions Costs and Agricultural Household Supply Resp... 1999 2026 2008 2017 2000 1999 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nigel Key United States 24 1.7k 1.3k 726 393 368 91 2.9k
Andrew Dorward United Kingdom 31 2.1k 1.2× 1.2k 0.9× 1.0k 1.4× 333 0.8× 422 1.1× 190 4.2k
David J. Spielman United States 32 2.0k 1.2× 887 0.7× 603 0.8× 670 1.7× 529 1.4× 134 3.5k
Johann F. Kirsten South Africa 26 1.3k 0.7× 676 0.5× 645 0.9× 568 1.4× 521 1.4× 210 2.9k
Alan Renwick New Zealand 27 1.2k 0.7× 675 0.5× 433 0.6× 377 1.0× 276 0.8× 117 2.9k
Solomon Asfaw Italy 25 1.7k 1.0× 635 0.5× 1.0k 1.4× 444 1.1× 202 0.5× 53 2.8k
Steven Haggblade United States 24 1.0k 0.6× 753 0.6× 603 0.8× 293 0.7× 158 0.4× 80 2.4k
Colin Poulton United Kingdom 24 1.2k 0.7× 679 0.5× 536 0.7× 204 0.5× 324 0.9× 109 2.4k
Xinshen Diao United States 29 972 0.6× 1.2k 0.9× 626 0.9× 178 0.5× 199 0.5× 120 2.9k
Arega D. Alene Tanzania 32 2.8k 1.6× 1.3k 1.0× 1.2k 1.7× 736 1.9× 235 0.6× 110 4.1k
Boris E. Bravo‐Ureta United States 33 2.4k 1.4× 1.1k 0.9× 1.0k 1.4× 344 0.9× 247 0.7× 116 4.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Nigel Key

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Key's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Key with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Key more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nigel Key

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Key. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Key. The network helps show where Nigel Key may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel Key

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel Key. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel Key based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel Key. Nigel Key is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bravo‐Ureta, Boris E., et al.. (2025). Ethnic and gender disparities in U.S. agriculture: An analysis of technology and technical efficiency differentials. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 107(4). 993–1015.
2.
Key, Nigel, et al.. (2018). The Income Volatility of U.S. Commercial Farm Households. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 40(2). 215–239. 14 indexed citations
3.
Ribaudo, Marc, Nigel Key, & Stacy Sneeringer. (2016). The Potential Role for a Nitrogen Compliance Policy in Mitigating Gulf Hypoxia. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 39(3). 458–478. 6 indexed citations
4.
Low, Sarah A., Aaron Adalja, Nigel Key, et al.. (2015). Trends in U.S. Local and Regional Food Systems: Report to Congress. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 112 indexed citations
5.
McBride, William D. & Nigel Key. (2013). U.S. Hog Production From 1992 to 2009: Technology, Restructuring, and Productivity Growth. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 19 indexed citations
6.
Weber, Jeremy G. & Nigel Key. (2012). How much Do Decoupled Payments Affect Production? An Instrumental Variable Approach with Panel Data. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 94(1). 52–66. 47 indexed citations
7.
Key, Nigel & William D. McBride. (2012). Economic and Structural Relationships in U.S. Hog Production.
8.
Key, Nigel, et al.. (2011). Carbon Prices and the Adoption of Methane Digesters on Dairy and Hog Farms. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 2 indexed citations
9.
Key, Nigel, et al.. (2011). Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies. Climatic Change. 112(2). 387–414. 45 indexed citations
10.
Sneeringer, Stacy & Nigel Key. (2011). Effects of Size‐Based Environmental Regulations: Evidence of Regulatory Avoidance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 93(4). 1189–1211. 24 indexed citations
11.
Gerber, Pierre, et al.. (2010). Policy options in addressing livestock’s contribution to climate change. animal. 4(3). 393–406. 30 indexed citations
12.
Key, Nigel & Robert J. Roberts. (2008). Do Decoupled Payments Stimulate Production? Estimating the Effect on Program Crop Acreage Using Matching. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 4 indexed citations
13.
Key, Nigel & William D. McBride. (2007). Production Contracts And Farm Productivity: Examining The Link Using Instrumental Variables. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2 indexed citations
14.
Key, Nigel, et al.. (2007). Do Government Payments Influence Farm Size and Survival?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 26 indexed citations
15.
McBride, William D., et al.. (2007). Characteristics and Production Costs of U.S. Hog Farms, 2004. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
16.
Roberts, Michael J. & Nigel Key. (2005). Losing Under Contract: Transaction-Cost Externalities and Spot Market Disintegration. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization. 3(2). 11 indexed citations
17.
MacDonald, James M., Janet E. Perry, Mary Clare Ahearn, et al.. (2004). Contracts, Markets, and Prices: Organizing the Production and Use of Agricultural Commodities. SSRN Electronic Journal. 86 indexed citations
18.
Key, Nigel. (2000). Savings, credit and the self-finance of crop production in Mexico.. 24(2). 161–175. 1 indexed citations
19.
Key, Nigel & David Runsten. (1999). Contract Farming, Smallholders, and Rural Development in Latin America: The Organization of Agroprocessing Firms and the Scale of Outgrower Production. World Development. 27(2). 381–401. 488 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Key, Nigel. (1998). Modeling and estimating agricultural household behavior under imperfect markets. UMI Dissertation Services eBooks. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026