Nicole C. Naus
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology top 5%
- Immunology top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Co-authors
- Annelies de KleinDion ParidaensEmine KılıçRobert M. VerdijkJolanda VaarwaterAnna E. KoopmansGregorius P. M. LuytenCornelia M. Mooy
- Topics
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments (49 papers)Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (14 papers)Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (12 papers)
- Cited by
- OphthalmologyOncologyImmunology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaClinical Cancer ResearchInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Nicole C. Naus
57 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Ophthalmology 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 562
- Oncology 543
- Immunology 355
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 240
Countries citing papers authored by Nicole C. Naus
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole C. Naus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole C. Naus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole C. Naus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole C. Naus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole C. Naus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole C. Naus. The network helps show where Nicole C. Naus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicole C. Naus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicole C. Naus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicole C. Naus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicole C. Naus. Nicole C. Naus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 102 |
About Nicole C. Naus
Nicole C. Naus is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Oncology and Immunology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Oncology and Treatments (49 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (14 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (1.1k citations), Oncology (543 citations) and Immunology (355 citations). Nicole C. Naus has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Annelies de Klein, Dion Paridaens, Emine Kılıç, Robert M. Verdijk, Jolanda Vaarwater, Anna E. Koopmans, Gregorius P. M. Luyten, Cornelia M. Mooy, Ellen van Drunen and Hanneke W. Mensink. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Clinical Cancer Research and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.