Nicolas Pinto

18 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate ...201120262016202120142011100200300

Peers

Nicolas Pinto
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 885
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 522
  • Artificial Intelligence 449
  • Signal Processing 170
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 170
Replace Jeffrey Mark Siskind with:
Jeffrey Mark Siskind United States
Pascal Lamblin Canada
Philip H. W. Leong Australia
Joseph F. Murray United States
Li Deng China
Hans Peter Graf United States
John C. Hart United States
Eduard Säckinger United States
Á. Rodríguez‐Vázquez Spain
Y. Le Cun United States
Nicolas Pinto relative to Jeffrey Mark Siskind United States Jeffrey Mark Siskind's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Jeffrey Mark Siskind · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Pinto. The network helps show where Nicolas Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicolas Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicolas Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicolas Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicolas Pinto. Nicolas Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2
Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognitionbreakdown →
391
3 26
4 1
5 73
6 41
7 7
8 2
9 132
10 47
11 77
12
PyCUDA and PyOpenCL: A scripting-based approach to GPU run-time code generationbreakdown →
352
13 162
14
PyCUDA: GPU Run-Time Code Generation for High-Performance Computing
53
15 135
16 9
17 359
18
Establishing Good Benchmarks and Baselines for Face Recognition
32

About Nicolas Pinto

Nicolas Pinto is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hardware and Architecture and Biophysics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face and Expression Recognition (8 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (6 papers) and Face recognition and analysis (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (885 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (522 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (151 citations). Nicolas Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David Cox, James J. DiCarlo, Andreas Klöckner, Paul Ivanov, Bryan Catanzaro, Ahmed R. Fasih, Yunsup Lee, Daniel Yamins, Ethan A. Solomon and Ha Hong. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Computational Biology, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security and Image and Vision Computing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026