Nicolas Lhoest
About
In The Last Decade
Nicolas Lhoest
4 papers receiving 123 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Surgery 117
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 106
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 104
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 6
- Biomedical Engineering 5
Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Lhoest
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Lhoest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Lhoest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Lhoest more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Lhoest
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Lhoest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Lhoest. The network helps show where Nicolas Lhoest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicolas Lhoest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicolas Lhoest. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicolas Lhoest based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicolas Lhoest. Nicolas Lhoest is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | [Percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusion]. | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 119 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.