Nicola Dalrymple
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Jesús Montero‐MarínDarren DunningWillem KuykenKate TudorTamsin FordTim DalgleishJulia FunkLucy Radley
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper)Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (1 paper)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEPsychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and PolicyEvidence-Based Mental Health
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyTrinidad and Tobago
In The Last Decade
Nicola Dalrymple
3 papers receiving 96 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- Clinical Psychology 79
- Social Psychology 19
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 15
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 14
- General Health Professions 12
Countries citing papers authored by Nicola Dalrymple
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicola Dalrymple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicola Dalrymple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicola Dalrymple more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicola Dalrymple
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicola Dalrymple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicola Dalrymple. The network helps show where Nicola Dalrymple may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicola Dalrymple
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicola Dalrymple. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicola Dalrymple based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicola Dalrymple. Nicola Dalrymple is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 66 | |
| 4 | Body image perception and the risk of unhealthy behaviours among university students. | 29 |
About Nicola Dalrymple
Nicola Dalrymple is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 4 papers that have together received 97 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (79 citations), Pharmacy (12 citations) and Applied Psychology (6 citations). Nicola Dalrymple has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Trinidad and Tobago. Frequent co-authors include Jesús Montero‐Marín, Darren Dunning, Willem Kuyken, Kate Tudor, Tamsin Ford, Tim Dalgleish, Julia Funk, Lucy Radley, Maris Vainre and Gerard Leavey. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy and Evidence-Based Mental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.