Nick Ellis

2.5k citations
48 papers · 1.9k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Ellis

48 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Nick Ellis
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.2k
  • Ecology 973
  • Ecological Modeling 158
  • Oceanography 434
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 433
Replace Damian P. Thomson with:
Damian P. Thomson Australia
Gregory R. Houseman United States
Tyler C. Coverdale United States
Jean‐Claude Lefeuvre France
Nancy L. Shaw United States
Lindsey J. Thompson United Kingdom
Elizabeth A. Chornesky United States
Ché Elkin Switzerland
Robert A. Briers United Kingdom
Donald R. Schoolmaster United States
Nick Ellis relative to Damian P. Thomson Australia Damian P. Thomson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Damian P. Thomson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Ellis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Ellis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Ellis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Ellis. The network helps show where Nick Ellis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Ellis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Ellis Line = papers co-authored together Nick Ellis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011393
2 2017247
3 2018138
4 201292
5 200892
6 201365
7 201661
8 201557
9 201248
10 199646
11 200640
12 201735
13
Evaluating marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives
201335
14 200333
15 201431
16 201228
17 199928
18 201128
19 200324
20 201524

About Nick Ellis

Nick Ellis is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography and Aquatic Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (30 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (16 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (14 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (14 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (6 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (4 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (3 papers) and Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (1.2k citations), Ecology (973 citations), Ecological Modeling (158 citations), Oceanography (434 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (433 citations). Nick Ellis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include C. Roland Pitcher, Stephen J. Smith, You‐Gan Wang, Roy A. Deng, Simon Jennings, Petri Suuronen, Ray Hilborn, Robert A. McConnaughey, Jan Geert Hiddink and Ana M. Parma. Their work appears in journals such as ICES Journal of Marine Science, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Continental Shelf Research, Fish and Fisheries and Journal of Applied Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact