Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England
2021497 citationsSonia Roschnik, Ben Ashby et al.The Lancet Planetary Healthprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Watts
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Watts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Watts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Watts more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Watts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Watts. The network helps show where Nicholas Watts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Watts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Watts.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Watts based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Watts. Nicholas Watts is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Roschnik, Sonia, Ben Ashby, Richard Boyd, et al.. (2021). Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England. The Lancet Planetary Health. 5(2). e84–e92.497 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Barros, Enrique, Mathias Bressel, Sandra Hacon, et al.. (2019). Lancet Countdown. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(41). 2286–2286.9 indexed citations
4.
Watts, Nicholas, Markus Amann, Sonja Ayeb‐Karlsson, et al.. (2018). The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: from 25 years of inaction to a global transformation for public health (vol 391, pg 540, 2017). UCL Discovery (University College London).3 indexed citations
Wandesforde‐Smith, Geoffrey & Nicholas Watts. (2013). Wildlife Conservation and Protected Areas: Politics, Procedure and the Performance of Failure Under the EU Birds and Habitats Directive. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Canning, John, et al.. (2007). Disciplines in dialogue: disciplinary perspectives on interdisciplinary teaching and learning. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).
Dear, Michael, et al.. (1988). Resolving Locational Conflicts. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 7(4). 744–744.6 indexed citations
14.
Schnaiberg, Allan, Nicholas Watts, & Klaus Zimmermann. (1986). Distributional conflicts in environmental-resource policy. Medical Entomology and Zoology.69 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.