Nicholas Marlow

419 total citations
20 papers, 314 citations indexed

About

Nicholas Marlow is a scholar working on Surgery, Physiology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicholas Marlow has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 314 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Physiology and 6 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Nicholas Marlow's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (9 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (6 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (6 papers). Nicholas Marlow is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (9 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (6 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (6 papers). Nicholas Marlow collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Ireland. Nicholas Marlow's co-authors include Guy J. Maddern, Wendy Babidge, Peter J. Hewett, John K. Field, Ian C. Dickinson, John C. Graham, Bruce Barraclough, Neil A. Collier, Guilherme Pena and Jonathan Fawcett and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, British journal of surgery and Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Nicholas Marlow

18 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicholas Marlow Australia 12 215 89 69 66 56 20 314
Andras B. Fecso Canada 9 275 1.3× 122 1.4× 72 1.0× 49 0.7× 80 1.4× 21 335
Timothy A. Plerhoples United States 7 238 1.1× 81 0.9× 44 0.6× 55 0.8× 78 1.4× 11 324
A Kurmann Switzerland 5 215 1.0× 75 0.8× 74 1.1× 31 0.5× 22 0.4× 5 344
Raaj K. Ruparel United States 12 252 1.2× 51 0.6× 106 1.5× 111 1.7× 104 1.9× 22 358
Iman Ghaderi United States 13 433 2.0× 119 1.3× 109 1.6× 92 1.4× 114 2.0× 52 522
Phillip G. Rowse United States 11 215 1.0× 79 0.9× 53 0.8× 55 0.8× 68 1.2× 39 324
Craig Nesbitt United Kingdom 10 143 0.7× 44 0.5× 88 1.3× 48 0.7× 74 1.3× 23 260
Nada Gawad Canada 12 178 0.8× 74 0.8× 36 0.5× 33 0.5× 204 3.6× 38 395
Ruma Bose United States 13 286 1.3× 217 2.4× 25 0.4× 71 1.1× 44 0.8× 44 491
Ryan Preece United Kingdom 11 140 0.7× 57 0.6× 32 0.5× 28 0.4× 88 1.6× 22 274

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Marlow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Marlow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Marlow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Marlow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Marlow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Marlow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Marlow. The network helps show where Nicholas Marlow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Marlow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Marlow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Marlow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Marlow. Nicholas Marlow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vieira, Matias C., Sophie Relph, Kirstie Coxon, et al.. (2024). Perinatal outcomes after selective third‐trimester ultrasound screening for small‐for‐gestational age: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 65(1). 30–38.
2.
Marlow, Nicholas, et al.. (2019). Clinical practice visits: a rapid review. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 89(9). 1004–1008.
3.
Marlow, Nicholas, et al.. (2019). Examination of participant preferences in the design and delivery of simulation-based education programmes. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning. 6(4). 245–246. 1 indexed citations
4.
Vreugdenburg, Thomas, et al.. (2018). Morbidity and mortality meetings: gold, silver or bronze?. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 88(10). 966–974. 11 indexed citations
5.
Marlow, Nicholas, Matthew J. W. Thomas, Peter J. Hewett, et al.. (2017). Non-technical skills of surgical trainees and experienced surgeons. British journal of surgery. 104(6). 777–785. 32 indexed citations
6.
Marlow, Nicholas, et al.. (2017). Do Surgeons React?. Annals of Surgery. 268(2). 277–281. 14 indexed citations
7.
Marlow, Nicholas, et al.. (2016). Systematic Review of Voluntary Participation in Simulation-Based Laparoscopic Skills Training: Motivators and Barriers for Surgical Trainee Attendance. Journal of surgical education. 74(2). 306–318. 32 indexed citations
8.
Vreugdenburg, Thomas, et al.. (2016). Practical applications of rapid review methods in the development of Australian health policy. Australian Health Review. 41(4). 463–468. 5 indexed citations
9.
Pena, Guilherme, John K. Field, Nicholas Marlow, et al.. (2015). What are the demographic predictors in laparoscopic simulator performance?. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 86(12). 983–989. 18 indexed citations
10.
Marlow, Nicholas, et al.. (2013). Laparoscopic Skills Maintenance: A Randomized Trial of Virtual Reality and Box Trainer Simulators. Journal of surgical education. 71(1). 79–84. 21 indexed citations
11.
Daruwalla, Jurstine, Nicholas Marlow, John K. Field, et al.. (2013). Effect of fatigue on laparoscopic skills: a comparative historical cohort study. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 84(3). 137–142. 8 indexed citations
12.
Xafis, Vicki, et al.. (2013). The efficacy of laparoscopic skills training in a Mobile Simulation Unit compared with a fixed site: a comparative study. Surgical Endoscopy. 27(7). 2606–2612. 13 indexed citations
13.
Marlow, Nicholas, et al.. (2013). Laparoscopic skills acquisition: a study of simulation and traditional training. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 84(12). 976–980. 11 indexed citations
14.
Marlow, Nicholas, et al.. (2012). A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training. Surgical Endoscopy. 26(11). 3207–3214. 32 indexed citations
15.
Marlow, Nicholas, Guy J. Maddern, Bruce Barraclough, et al.. (2010). Systematic review of the impact of volume of oesophagectomy on patient outcome. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 80(5). 317–323. 29 indexed citations
16.
Marlow, Nicholas, Guy J. Maddern, Bruce Barraclough, et al.. (2010). Radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the impact of hospital and surgeon volume on patient outcome. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 80(1-2). 24–29. 13 indexed citations
17.
Marlow, Nicholas, Bruce Barraclough, Neil A. Collier, et al.. (2010). Effect of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on Patient Outcomes Following Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 40(5). 572–579. 29 indexed citations
18.
Marlow, Nicholas, Bruce Barraclough, Neil A. Collier, et al.. (2010). Centralization and the relationship between volume and outcome in knee arthroplasty procedures. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 80(4). 234–241. 31 indexed citations
19.
Garcea, Giuseppe, Stéphanie O. Breukink, Nicholas Marlow, et al.. (2009). A systematic review of the impact of volume of hepatic surgery on patient outcome. Surgery. 145(5). 467–475. 13 indexed citations
20.
Marlow, Nicholas, et al.. (2002). Internet-mediated education in neonatal medicine: Module development. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026