Nicholas M. Kearns
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Materials Chemistry
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Martin T. ZanniAndrew C. JonesRandy D. MehlenbacherJia-Jung HoMichael S. ArnoldRyan M. YoungJonathan D. SchultzMichael R. Wasielewski
- Topics
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (7 papers)Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers)Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CNature Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nicholas M. Kearns
8 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 213
- Spectroscopy 97
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 96
- Materials Chemistry 78
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 47
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas M. Kearns
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas M. Kearns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas M. Kearns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas M. Kearns more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas M. Kearns
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas M. Kearns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas M. Kearns. The network helps show where Nicholas M. Kearns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas M. Kearns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas M. Kearns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas M. Kearns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas M. Kearns. Nicholas M. Kearns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 51 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 66 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 83 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 35 |
About Nicholas M. Kearns
Nicholas M. Kearns is a scholar working on Biophysics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (7 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (213 citations), Biophysics (39 citations) and Spectroscopy (97 citations). Nicholas M. Kearns has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin T. Zanni, Andrew C. Jones, Randy D. Mehlenbacher, Jia-Jung Ho, Michael S. Arnold, Ryan M. Young, Jonathan D. Schultz, Michael R. Wasielewski, Michelle Chen and Thomas Joseph McDonough. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and Nature Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.