Nicholas K. Proctor

5.7k total citations · 4 hit papers
7 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Nicholas K. Proctor is a scholar working on Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicholas K. Proctor has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Physiology, 7 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Nicholas K. Proctor's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). Nicholas K. Proctor is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (7 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). Nicholas K. Proctor collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Germany. Nicholas K. Proctor's co-authors include Jeffrey L. Dage, Niklas Mattsson, Oskar Hansson, Sebastian Palmqvist, Erik Stomrud, Shorena Janelidze, Ruben Smith, Xiyun Chai, Kaj Blennow and Henrik Zetterberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Medicine, Nature Communications and JAMA Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Nicholas K. Proctor

7 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer’s disease: relationship to o... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 2020 2021 2020 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicholas K. Proctor United States 6 1.2k 983 365 351 166 7 1.7k
Anniina Snellman Finland 19 1.2k 0.9× 830 0.8× 394 1.1× 307 0.9× 151 0.9× 44 1.7k
Niki S.M. Schoonenboom Netherlands 22 1.3k 1.1× 1.0k 1.1× 435 1.2× 530 1.5× 195 1.2× 37 2.1k
Ronald Lautner Sweden 10 1.1k 0.9× 688 0.7× 533 1.5× 392 1.1× 151 0.9× 14 1.8k
Nathalie Le Bastard Belgium 24 1.3k 1.1× 1.1k 1.1× 425 1.2× 306 0.9× 217 1.3× 61 2.0k
Inge M.W. Verberk Netherlands 22 1.4k 1.2× 1.2k 1.2× 473 1.3× 486 1.4× 188 1.1× 74 2.2k
Hyun‐Sik Yang United States 20 674 0.6× 492 0.5× 313 0.9× 296 0.8× 192 1.2× 51 1.3k
Małgorzata Knapik-Czajka Poland 9 1.4k 1.2× 1.3k 1.3× 404 1.1× 374 1.1× 394 2.4× 22 2.1k
Maartje I. Kester Netherlands 22 1.1k 0.9× 898 0.9× 356 1.0× 445 1.3× 123 0.7× 35 1.7k
Hlin Kvartsberg Sweden 15 936 0.8× 580 0.6× 391 1.1× 320 0.9× 156 0.9× 39 1.3k
Gabrielle Strobel United States 4 874 0.7× 566 0.6× 435 1.2× 291 0.8× 136 0.8× 11 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas K. Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas K. Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas K. Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas K. Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas K. Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas K. Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas K. Proctor. The network helps show where Nicholas K. Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas K. Proctor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas K. Proctor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas K. Proctor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas K. Proctor. Nicholas K. Proctor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Brickman, Adam M., Jennifer J. Manly, Lawrence S. Honig, et al.. (2021). Plasma p‐tau181, p‐tau217, and other blood‐based Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in a multi‐ethnic, community study. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 17(8). 1353–1364. 231 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Mielke, Michelle M., Jeremiah A. Aakre, Alicia Algeciras‐Schimnich, et al.. (2021). Comparison of CSF phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 for cognitive decline. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 18(4). 602–611. 31 indexed citations
3.
Cullen, Nicholas, Antoine Leuzy, Sebastian Palmqvist, et al.. (2020). Individualized prognosis of cognitive decline and dementia in mild cognitive impairment based on plasma biomarker combinations. Nature Aging. 1(1). 114–123. 119 indexed citations
4.
Janelidze, Shorena, Erik Stomrud, Ruben Smith, et al.. (2020). Cerebrospinal fluid p-tau217 performs better than p-tau181 as a biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Communications. 11(1). 1683–1683. 292 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Janelidze, Shorena, Niklas Mattsson, Sebastian Palmqvist, et al.. (2020). Plasma P-tau181 in Alzheimer’s disease: relationship to other biomarkers, differential diagnosis, neuropathology and longitudinal progression to Alzheimer’s dementia. Nature Medicine. 26(3). 379–386. 765 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Mielke, Michelle M., Jeremiah A. Aakre, Nicholas K. Proctor, et al.. (2020). Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau 181 and 217 for cognitive progression. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 16(S5). 1 indexed citations
7.
Janelidze, Shorena, David Berron, Ruben Smith, et al.. (2020). Associations of Plasma Phospho-Tau217 Levels With Tau Positron Emission Tomography in Early Alzheimer Disease. JAMA Neurology. 78(2). 149–149. 222 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026