Nicholas E. Lea

567 total citations
8 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

Nicholas E. Lea is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Virology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicholas E. Lea has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Virology. Recurrent topics in Nicholas E. Lea's work include Rabies epidemiology and control (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). Nicholas E. Lea is often cited by papers focused on Rabies epidemiology and control (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). Nicholas E. Lea collaborates with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. Nicholas E. Lea's co-authors include Ian R. Wickersham, Lei Jin, Thomas K. Lavin, Michelle M. Meyer, Arianne M. Babina, Yuanyuan Hou, Guoping Feng, Heather A. Sullivan, Tomomi Aida and Dheeraj S. Roy and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Neuron.

In The Last Decade

Nicholas E. Lea

8 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nicholas E. Lea United States	6	86	74	62	33	32	8	195
Heather A. Sullivan United States	8	88 1.0×	129 1.7×	128 2.1×	26 0.8×	35 1.1×	17	313
Kei Oyama Japan	10	86 1.0×	156 2.1×	162 2.6×	11 0.3×	17 0.5×	27	309
Thomas K. Lavin United States	6	41 0.5×	34 0.5×	87 1.4×	10 0.3×	12 0.4×	9	177
Moritz Negwer Netherlands	9	177 2.1×	126 1.7×	122 2.0×	104 3.2×	8 0.3×	13	357
Caterina Montani Italy	7	101 1.2×	63 0.9×	21 0.3×	41 1.2×	25 0.8×	10	180
Adrienne C. Philson United States	5	134 1.6×	205 2.8×	109 1.8×	16 0.5×	53 1.7×	5	377
Konrad Juczewski United States	5	111 1.3×	170 2.3×	132 2.1×	37 1.1×	26 0.8×	5	305
Ana González-Rueda United Kingdom	7	128 1.5×	229 3.1×	176 2.8×	25 0.8×	26 0.8×	9	390
Yudong Gao United States	7	123 1.4×	110 1.5×	68 1.1×	33 1.0×	7 0.2×	16	247
Karen Runge Germany	4	84 1.0×	86 1.2×	30 0.5×	28 0.8×	7 0.2×	4	217

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas E. Lea

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas E. Lea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas E. Lea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas E. Lea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas E. Lea

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas E. Lea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas E. Lea. The network helps show where Nicholas E. Lea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas E. Lea

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas E. Lea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas E. Lea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas E. Lea. Nicholas E. Lea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Jin, Lei, Heather A. Sullivan, Thomas K. Lavin, et al.. (2024). Long-term labeling and imaging of synaptically connected neuronal networks in vivo using double-deletion-mutant rabies viruses. Nature Neuroscience. 27(2). 373–383. 2 indexed citations

2.

Jin, Lei, Heather A. Sullivan, Thomas K. Lavin, et al.. (2023). “Self-inactivating” rabies viruses are susceptible to loss of their intended attenuating modification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(7). e2023481120–e2023481120. 5 indexed citations

3.

Jin, Lei, Heather A. Sullivan, Nicholas E. Lea, et al.. (2023). Third-generation rabies viral vectors allow nontoxic retrograde targeting of projection neurons with greatly increased efficiency. Cell Reports Methods. 3(11). 100644–100644. 5 indexed citations

4.

Roy, Dheeraj S., Yi Zhu, Yefei Chen, et al.. (2022). Targeting thalamic circuits rescues motor and mood deficits in PD mice. Nature. 607(7918). 321–329. 59 indexed citations

5.

Lea, Nicholas E., Qiangge Zhang, Martin Wienisch, et al.. (2022). 341 Repeats Is Not Enough for Methylation in a New Fragile X Mouse Model. eNeuro. 9(5). ENEURO.0142–22.2022. 4 indexed citations

6.

Roy, Dheeraj S., Ying Zhang, Tomomi Aida, et al.. (2021). Anterior thalamic dysfunction underlies cognitive deficits in a subset of neuropsychiatric disease models. Neuron. 109(16). 2590–2603.e13. 49 indexed citations

7.

Lavin, Thomas K., Lei Jin, Nicholas E. Lea, & Ian R. Wickersham. (2020). Monosynaptic Tracing Success Depends Critically on Helper Virus Concentrations. Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience. 12. 6–6. 42 indexed citations

8.

Babina, Arianne M., Nicholas E. Lea, & Michelle M. Meyer. (2017). In Vivo Behavior of the Tandem Glycine Riboswitch in Bacillus subtilis. mBio. 8(5). 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact