Nicholas C.L. Wong
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Immunology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Phyllis F. CheungST CheungSheung Tat FanHong Hoi TingLevente K. MeszarosGary CookChangchun LiuJinhua Zhao
- Topics
- Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (5 papers)Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers)Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Nicholas C.L. Wong
10 papers receiving 394 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Oncology 226
- Molecular Biology 171
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 164
- Immunology 68
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 40
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas C.L. Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas C.L. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas C.L. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas C.L. Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas C.L. Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas C.L. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas C.L. Wong. The network helps show where Nicholas C.L. Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas C.L. Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas C.L. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas C.L. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas C.L. Wong. Nicholas C.L. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Preclinical development and characterisation of 99mTc-NM-01 for SPECT/CT imaging of human PD-L1. | 7 |
| 3 | 79 | |
| 4 | Assessing PD-L1 expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer patients using68Ga-Labeled Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Single-Domain Antibody PET/CT | 1 |
| 5 | 125 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 117 |
About Nicholas C.L. Wong
Nicholas C.L. Wong is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Oncology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 10 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (5 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (226 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (164 citations) and Immunology (68 citations). Nicholas C.L. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Phyllis F. Cheung, ST Cheung, Sheung Tat Fan, Hong Hoi Ting, Levente K. Meszaros, Gary Cook, Changchun Liu, Jinhua Zhao, Yan Xing and Lingzhou Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, PLoS ONE and Carcinogenesis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.