Nicholas C. Dias
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Yphtach LelkesDavid G. RandGordon PennycookJames DruckmanMatthew LevenduskyKenneth M. WinnegJosh PasekKathleen Hall Jamieson
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers)Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers)Social Media and Politics (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of Political ScienceThe Journal of Politics
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmark
In The Last Decade
Nicholas C. Dias
8 papers receiving 241 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Sociology and Political Science 187
- Communication 122
- Political Science and International Relations 91
- Artificial Intelligence 48
- Social Psychology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas C. Dias
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas C. Dias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas C. Dias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas C. Dias more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas C. Dias
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas C. Dias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas C. Dias. The network helps show where Nicholas C. Dias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas C. Dias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas C. Dias. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas C. Dias based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas C. Dias. Nicholas C. Dias is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan Identitybreakdown → | 123 |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 71 |
About Nicholas C. Dias
Nicholas C. Dias is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Communication and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 8 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers), Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers) and Social Media and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (122 citations), Sociology and Political Science (187 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (91 citations). Nicholas C. Dias has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Yphtach Lelkes, David G. Rand, Gordon Pennycook, James Druckman, Matthew Levendusky, Kenneth M. Winneg, Josh Pasek, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, R. Lance Holbert and Sean Westwood. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.