Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015
20151.1k citationsNic Newman, David A. Levy et al.SSRN Electronic Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Nic Newman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nic Newman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nic Newman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nic Newman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nic Newman. The network helps show where Nic Newman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nic Newman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nic Newman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nic Newman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nic Newman. Nic Newman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Antonis Kalogeropoulos, David A. Levy, & Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. (2023). Reuters Institute digital news report 2012. VU Research Portal. 2019.20 indexed citations
7.
Kalogeropoulos, Antonis, et al.. (2023). The future of online news video. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).3 indexed citations
Kalogeropoulos, Antonis & Nic Newman. (2017). ‘I Saw the News on Facebook’ Brand Attribution When Accessing News From Distributed Environments. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).8 indexed citations
11.
Thurman, Neil, Steve Schifferes, Richard Fletcher, et al.. (2016). Giving Computers a Nose for News. Digital Journalism. 4(7). 838–848.24 indexed citations
12.
Newman, Nic. (2016). Journalism, media and technology predictions 2016. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).4 indexed citations
13.
Fletcher, Richard, Damian Radcliffe, David A. Levy, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, & Nic Newman. (2015). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015: Supplementary Report. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).14 indexed citations
14.
Fletcher, Richard, Damian Radcliffe, David A. Levy, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, & Nic Newman. (2015). Digital news report 2015: Supplementary report.1 indexed citations
15.
Thurman, Neil & Nic Newman. (2014). The Future of Breaking News Online? A Study of Live Blogs Through Surveys of Their Consumption, and of Readers' Attitudes and Participation. SSRN Electronic Journal.
16.
Levy, David A. & Nic Newman. (2014). Reuters Institute digital news report 2014.12 indexed citations
17.
Newman, Nic. (2014). Apple iBeacon technology briefing. Journal of Direct Data and Digital Marketing Practice. 15(3). 222–225.106 indexed citations
Newman, Nic. (2011). Mainstream media and the distribution of news in the age of social media. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).23 indexed citations
20.
Newman, Nic. (2009). The rise of social media and its impact on mainstream journalism. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).82 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.