Niamh Devane

14 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Niamh Devane
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Rehabilitation 201
  • Occupational Therapy 64
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 211
  • Human-Computer Interaction 52
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 14
Replace Celia Woolf with:
Celia Woolf United Kingdom
Anna Caute United Kingdom
Shira Yalon‐Chamovitz Israel
Christos Salis United Kingdom
Michelle C. Attard Australia
Christine Baron United States
Marcella Carragher Australia
Abby Foster Australia
Jon G. Lyon United States
Chih-Chung Wang Taiwan
Niamh Devane relative to Celia Woolf United Kingdom Celia Woolf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Celia Woolf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Niamh Devane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Niamh Devane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Niamh Devane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Niamh Devane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Niamh Devane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Niamh Devane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Niamh Devane. The network helps show where Niamh Devane may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Niamh Devane, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Niamh Devane Line = papers co-authored together Niamh Devane links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201590
2 201681
3 202042
4 201729
5 201827
6 201826
7 202217
8 201817
9 202014
10 20216
11 20225
12 20244
13 20242
14 20231
15 20250
16 20250

About Niamh Devane

Niamh Devane is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, Speech and Hearing and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (11 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (11 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (2 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (2 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (201 citations), Occupational Therapy (64 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (211 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (52 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (14 citations). Niamh Devane has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jane Marshall, Stephanie Wilson, Celia Woolf, Richard Talbot, Julia Galliers, Tracey Booth, Katerina Hilari, Abi Roper, Helen Greenwood and Miranda L. Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Aphasiology, Disability and Rehabilitation, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders and Journal of Voice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact