New York

600 total citations
13 papers, 31 citations indexed

About

New York is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, New York has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 31 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 1 paper in Neurology and 1 paper in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in New York's work include Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Blood properties and coagulation (1 paper) and Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper). New York is often cited by papers focused on Retinal and Optic Conditions (1 paper), Blood properties and coagulation (1 paper) and Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper). New York collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Germany. New York's co-authors include Mark J. Kupersmith, Robin L. Gal, Roy W. Beck, Neil R. Miller, M. Schick, John C.M. Brust, Laura S. Boylan, Charles Tilly, Richard G. Stefanacci and Nicole Brandt and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Neurology and Environmental Health Perspectives.

In The Last Decade

New York

9 papers receiving 26 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
New York United States	4	7	6	6	6	5	13	31
Giuseppe Cascone Italy	4	6 0.9×		12 2.0×	5 0.8×		8	46
Lucia Benfatto Italy	3	5 0.7×		3 0.5×	5 0.8×		3	26
Rose Edmonds United States	3	5 0.7×	10 1.7×		3 0.5×		6	24
Xuehao Cui China	4	5 0.7×	4 0.7×		2 0.3×		11	32
Alexandra Bedossa France	2	15 2.1×		2 0.3×	3 0.5×		3	50
Adrian Horak South Africa	4	2 0.3×			4 0.7×	6 1.2×	5	36
Marek Turnovec Czechia	4	4 0.6×	2 0.3×			5 1.0×	6	41
Harold A. Sloas United States	4	8 1.1×	15 2.5×			6 1.2×	4	48
Savo Raičević Serbia	3	8 1.1×			4 0.7×	20 4.0×	6	32
Tabitha Bloom United Kingdom	2	3 0.4×			2 0.3×	5 1.0×	2	18

Countries citing papers authored by New York

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of New York's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New York with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New York more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by New York

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by New York. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by New York. The network helps show where New York may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of New York

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of New York. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of New York based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with New York. New York is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Sonney, Jennifer, et al.. (2022). Our Time is Now. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 36(4). 303–304.

2.

Galik, Elizabeth, Richard G. Stefanacci, Nicole Brandt, et al.. (2019). Journal Highlights From the November and December Issues of JAMDA. Caring for the Ages. 20(8). 22–22. 1 indexed citations

3.

York, New, et al.. (2012). Joint Report With Comprehensive Plan And Recommendations.

4.

Kupersmith, Mark J., Robin L. Gal, Roy W. Beck, Neil R. Miller, & New York. (2008). Visual function at baseline and 1 month in acute optic neuritis: Predictors of visual outcome. Neurology. 70(9). 738–738. 6 indexed citations

5.

York, New, et al.. (2008). Nachruf auf Charles Tilly (1929-2008). Berliner Journal für Soziologie. 18(2). 334–336.

6.

York, New. (2007). Number of bipolar disorder diagnoses leaps among US young people. BMJ. 335(7619). 535.2–535.

7.

Boylan, Laura S., et al.. (2006). Diagnostic performance of spectroscopic and perfusion MRI for distinction of brain tumors. Neurology. 67(5). 920–920. 8 indexed citations

8.

Veith, Frank J., et al.. (1998). The American Board of Surgery Sub Board for Vascular Surgery: A note of caution. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 28(3). 575–576. 1 indexed citations

9.

Schick, M., et al.. (1996). INHALT / CONTENTS. Tenside Surfactants Detergents. 33(1). 3–4. 2 indexed citations

10.

York, New, et al.. (1979). IAC volume 53 Cover and Front matter. International Astronomical Union Colloquium. 53. f1–f11. 1 indexed citations

11.

Cederlöf, Rune, Richard Doll, Bruce A. Fowler, et al.. (1978). Air pollution and cancer: risk assessment methodology and epidemiological evidence. Report of a task group. Environmental Health Perspectives. 22. 1–12. 7 indexed citations

12.

Cederlöf, Rune, Richard Doll, Bruce A. Fowler, et al.. (1978). Air pollution and cancer: risk assessment methodology and epidemiological evidence. Report of a task group.. Environmental Health Perspectives. 22. 1–12. 1 indexed citations

13.

York, New, et al.. (1961). Clinical Section: Modern Methods for Quantitation of Red Blood Cell Production and Destruction: Erythrokinetics. Blood. 18(2). 225–235. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact