Nenad Čuš Babić
- Building and Construction top 2%
- Geology top 2%
- Civil and Structural Engineering top 10%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Danijel ReboljPeter PodbreznikZoran PučkoDomen MongusAndrej TibautBojan MusilMilan RadosavljevićMatjaž Perc
- Topics
- BIM and Construction Integration (9 papers)Manufacturing Process and Optimization (4 papers)3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SloveniaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nenad Čuš Babić
15 papers receiving 505 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Building and Construction 346
- Geology 223
- Civil and Structural Engineering 159
- Management Science and Operations Research 128
- Environmental Engineering 83
Countries citing papers authored by Nenad Čuš Babić
This map shows the geographic impact of Nenad Čuš Babić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nenad Čuš Babić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nenad Čuš Babić more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nenad Čuš Babić
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nenad Čuš Babić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nenad Čuš Babić. The network helps show where Nenad Čuš Babić may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nenad Čuš Babić
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nenad Čuš Babić. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nenad Čuš Babić based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nenad Čuš Babić. Nenad Čuš Babić is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 141 | |
| 6 | "What is seen is who you are: Are cues in selfie pictures related to personality characteristics?": Corrigendum. | 1 |
| 7 | Culture change in construction industry: from 2D toward BIM based construction | 17 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 87 | |
| 10 | 122 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 99 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1 |
About Nenad Čuš Babić
Nenad Čuš Babić is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Geology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 535 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BIM and Construction Integration (9 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (4 papers) and 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geology (223 citations), Building and Construction (346 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (128 citations). Nenad Čuš Babić has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Danijel Rebolj, Peter Podbreznik, Zoran Pučko, Domen Mongus, Andrej Tibaut, Bojan Musil, Milan Radosavljević, Matjaž Perc and Nejc Plohl. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Automation in Construction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.