Nele De Bal
About
In The Last Decade
Nele De Bal
10 papers receiving 441 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 350
- General Health Professions 231
- Clinical Psychology 201
- Psychiatry and Mental health 49
- Sociology and Political Science 30
Countries citing papers authored by Nele De Bal
This map shows the geographic impact of Nele De Bal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nele De Bal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nele De Bal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nele De Bal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nele De Bal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nele De Bal. The network helps show where Nele De Bal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nele De Bal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nele De Bal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nele De Bal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nele De Bal. Nele De Bal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 53 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 83 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 51 | |
| 10 | 54 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.