Neill Jones
Impact in
- Health Information Management top 0.5%
- Electronic Health Records Systems
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 2
- Co-authors
- Peter D. Johnson (1 shared paper)Anand Kumar (1 shared paper)Richard Hall (2 shared papers)Silvana Quaglini (1 shared paper)Robert A. Greenes (1 shared paper)Silvia Miksch (1 shared paper)Mario Stefanelli (1 shared paper)Edward H. Shortliffe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (1 paper)Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics (1 paper)Australian Health Review (3 papers)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Neill Jones
6 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Health Information Management 179
- Management Information Systems 82
- Medical Terminology 2
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 154
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
Countries citing papers authored by Neill Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Neill Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neill Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neill Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neill Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neill Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neill Jones. The network helps show where Neill Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Neill Jones, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 346 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 5 | Designing, specifying and evaluating a new repeat prescribing process for UK general practice. | 2000 | 2 |
| 6 | 2002 | 1 |
About Neill Jones
Neill Jones is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Molecular Biology, Health Information Management, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper) and Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (179 citations), Management Information Systems (82 citations), Medical Terminology (2 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (154 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations). Neill Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Peter D. Johnson, Anand Kumar, Richard Hall, Silvana Quaglini, Robert A. Greenes, Silvia Miksch, Mario Stefanelli, Edward H. Shortliffe, Mor Peleg and Jonathan Bury. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, Australian Health Review and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.