Neil W. Stuart

535 total citations
11 papers, 212 citations indexed

About

Neil W. Stuart is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Neil W. Stuart has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 212 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Plant Science, 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Neil W. Stuart's work include Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (7 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). Neil W. Stuart is often cited by papers focused on Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (7 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (2 papers). Neil W. Stuart collaborates with scholars based in United States. Neil W. Stuart's co-authors include H. M. Cathey, S. Åsen, G. L. Steffens, R. H. Zimmerman, S. L. Emsweller, A. W. Specht, Mike Smith, Ruth Dill‐Macky, Yue Jin and Emily Conley and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and HortScience.

In The Last Decade

Neil W. Stuart

11 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Neil W. Stuart United States	7	175	56	26	23	18	11	212
Paul C. Marth United States	7	153 0.9×	47 0.8×	15 0.6×	22 1.0×	16 0.9×	17	225
C. R. Vonk Netherlands	11	229 1.3×	99 1.8×	30 1.2×	16 0.7×	12 0.7×	21	286
G. K. Rasmussen United States	10	224 1.3×	66 1.2×	11 0.4×	17 0.7×	4 0.2×	20	263
Helen P. Sorokin United States	10	173 1.0×	144 2.6×	39 1.5×	19 0.8×	5 0.3×	23	274
D. S. Van Fleet United States	5	177 1.0×	63 1.1×	53 2.0×	18 0.8×	3 0.2×	5	236
L. PECORI VETTORI Italy	8	197 1.1×	67 1.2×	10 0.4×	28 1.2×	39 2.2×	13	267
Gunnar Fridborg Sweden	5	309 1.8×	328 5.9×	33 1.3×	44 1.9×	5 0.3×	7	368
G. Ramakrishnan India	6	265 1.5×	67 1.2×	10 0.4×	45 2.0×	6 0.3×	12	293
Gordon R. Hanks United Kingdom	10	304 1.7×	116 2.1×	71 2.7×	92 4.0×	37 2.1×	48	351
F. Paul Silverman United States	8	286 1.6×	130 2.3×	20 0.8×	27 1.2×	13 0.7×	9	341

Countries citing papers authored by Neil W. Stuart

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil W. Stuart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil W. Stuart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil W. Stuart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil W. Stuart

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil W. Stuart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil W. Stuart. The network helps show where Neil W. Stuart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil W. Stuart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil W. Stuart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil W. Stuart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil W. Stuart. Neil W. Stuart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Anderson, James A., Jochum Wiersma, Emily Conley, et al.. (2024). Registration of ‘MN‐Rothsay’ spring wheat with high grain yield and lodging resistance. Journal of Plant Registrations. 19(1). 1 indexed citations

2.

Anderson, James A., Jochum Wiersma, Emily Conley, et al.. (2024). Registration of ‘MN‐Torgy’ spring wheat with moderate resistance to Fusarium head blight and adult plant resistance to Ug99 stem rust. Journal of Plant Registrations. 18(1). 122–133. 1 indexed citations

3.

Stuart, Neil W., et al.. (1966). Accelerated Flowering of Bulbous Iris after Exposure to Ethylene. HortScience. 1(1). 19–20. 17 indexed citations

4.

Cathey, H. M., G. L. Steffens, Neil W. Stuart, & R. H. Zimmerman. (1966). Chemical Pruning of Plants. Science. 153(3742). 1382–1383. 41 indexed citations

5.

Cathey, H. M. & Neil W. Stuart. (1961). Comparative Plant Growth-Retarding Activity of Amo-1618, Phosfon, and CCC. Botanical Gazette. 123(1). 51–57. 69 indexed citations

6.

Stuart, Neil W. & H. M. Cathey. (1961). Applied Aspects of the Gibberellins. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 12(1). 369–394. 46 indexed citations

7.

Stuart, Neil W.. (1961). Initiation of Flower Buds in Rhododendron after Application of Growth Retardants. Science. 134(3471). 50–52. 8 indexed citations

8.

Stuart, Neil W.. (1961). Initiation of Flower Buds in Rhododendron after Application of Growth Retardants. Science. 134(3471). 50–52. 5 indexed citations

9.

Emsweller, S. L., et al.. (1960). The roles of naphthalene acetamide and potassium gibberellate in overcoming self-incompatibility in Lilium longiflorum.. 75. 8 indexed citations

10.

Åsen, S., Neil W. Stuart, & A. W. Specht. (1960). Color of Hydrangea macrophylla sepals as influenced by the carry-over effects from summer applications of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.. 76. 6 indexed citations

11.

Åsen, S., H. M. Cathey, & Neil W. Stuart. (1960). Enhancement of Gibberellin Growth-Promoting Activity by Hydrangenol Isolated from Leaves of Hydrangea Macrophylla. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 35(6). 816–819. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact