Neil T. Diamond

23 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Neil T. Diamond
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 64
  • Clinical Psychology 46
  • Management Science and Operations Research 33
  • Education 29
Replace Antonio Calcagnì with:
Antonio Calcagnì Italy
Dries Debeer Belgium
Eren Can Aybek Türkiye
Allen H. Wolach United States
Youri L. Mora Belgium
Henry E. Garrett United States
Maximilian Maier United Kingdom
Janet M. Gibson United States
Chelsea Muth United States
Sara van Erp Netherlands
Neil T. Diamond relative to Antonio Calcagnì Italy Antonio Calcagnì's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Antonio Calcagnì · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil T. Diamond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil T. Diamond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil T. Diamond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil T. Diamond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil T. Diamond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil T. Diamond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil T. Diamond. The network helps show where Neil T. Diamond may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil T. Diamond

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil T. Diamond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil T. Diamond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil T. Diamond. Neil T. Diamond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 14
2 6
3 83
4 42
5 4
6 1
7 4
8 14
9
Integral Inequalities of Grüss Type via Pólya-Szegö and Shisha-Mond Results
17
10 30
11
SIMPLIFYING CONSULTING PROBLEMS FOR USE IN INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS LECTURES
3
12 5
13 8
14 1
15
A Discrete Grüss Type Inequality and Applicationsfor the Moments of Random Variables and Guessing Mappings
5
16 2
17 12
18 5
19 4
20
An Analysis of Taguchi's Method of Confirmatory Trials
13

About Neil T. Diamond

Neil T. Diamond is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms (5 papers), Optimal Experimental Design Methods (4 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (64 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations) and Statistics and Probability (28 citations). Neil T. Diamond has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ewa Sztendur, Melinda L. Jackson, Dorothy Bruck, Julie Byles, Kate de Bruin, Sever S Dragomir, Joanne Deppeler, Dennis W. Moore, David C. Steart and David R. Greenwood. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Educational Research, BMC Public Health and Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026