Neil M. Kurtz

504 citations
18 papers · 393 indexed · h-index 11

Neil M. Kurtz

18 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Neil M. Kurtz
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 189
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
  • Pharmacology 74
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 71
  • Philosophy 33
Replace L. G. Schmidt with:
L. G. Schmidt Germany
Klaus-Dieter Stoll Germany
Carl H. Miller Austria
Dale R. Grothe United States
Ralph N. Wharton United States
E Varga United States
Lehmann He Canada
L. Potter United States
Leif H. Lindstr�m Sweden
Kalyna Z. Bezchlibnyk-Butler Canada
Neil M. Kurtz relative to L. G. Schmidt Germany L. G. Schmidt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
L. G. Schmidt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neil M. Kurtz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neil M. Kurtz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil M. Kurtz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil M. Kurtz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neil M. Kurtz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil M. Kurtz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil M. Kurtz. The network helps show where Neil M. Kurtz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neil M. Kurtz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neil M. Kurtz Line = papers co-authored together Neil M. Kurtz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200731
2 199771
3 199639
4 199679
5 19964
6
Anxiolytic Compounds: Perspectives in Drug Development
19968
7 19964
8
Limitations of Levothyroxine Bioequivalence Evaluation: Analysis of An Attempted Study.
199520
9 19914
10 19881
11
A 5-HT1A ligand with both antidepressant and anxiolytic properties.
198832
12
Treatment of panic and phobic disorders.
198710
13 19875
14
Monoamine oxidase inhibiting drugs pharmacologic and therapeutic issues
198719
15 19843
16 198411
17 198236
18 198016

About Neil M. Kurtz

Neil M. Kurtz is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (189 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations) and Pharmacology (74 citations). Neil M. Kurtz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Neal R. Cutler, John J. Sramek, Edyta J. Frackiewicz, Arthur Kling, D. S. Robinson, Thomas Shiovitz, John J. Sramek, Richard D. Hartman, K. H. Tachiki and Donald S. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Anesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026