Neil Chakraborti
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jon GarlandIrene ZempiBasia SpalekAndrew WillisMartin GillAdam WebbDavid GaddManish Pareek
- Topics
- Migration, Refugees, and Integration (9 papers)Rural development and sustainability (6 papers)Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSociologyJournal of Interpersonal Violence
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Neil Chakraborti
35 papers receiving 696 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Sociology and Political Science 562
- Political Science and International Relations 167
- Gender Studies 141
- General Health Professions 114
- Social Psychology 105
Countries citing papers authored by Neil Chakraborti
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil Chakraborti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil Chakraborti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil Chakraborti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil Chakraborti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil Chakraborti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil Chakraborti. The network helps show where Neil Chakraborti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil Chakraborti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil Chakraborti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil Chakraborti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil Chakraborti. Neil Chakraborti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | LGB&T hate crime reporting : identifying barriers and solutions | 20 |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | Public authority commitment and action to eliminate targeted harassment and violence | 0 |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Neil Chakraborti
Neil Chakraborti is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Refugees, and Integration (9 papers), Rural development and sustainability (6 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (141 citations), Sociology and Political Science (562 citations) and Health (81 citations). Neil Chakraborti has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Jon Garland, Irene Zempi, Basia Spalek, Andrew Willis, Martin Gill, Adam Webb, David Gadd, Manish Pareek, Mayuri Gogoi and Christopher D. Bayliss. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sociology and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.