Neda Khanlarkhani
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Immunology top 10%
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Keywan MortezaeeBagher FarhoodNasser Hashemi GoradelMasoud NajafiMaryam Shabani NashtaeiAdib ZendedelEnsieh SalehiCordian Beyer
- Topics
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers)Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers)Testicular diseases and treatments (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Neda Khanlarkhani
24 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Molecular Biology 716
- Immunology 349
- Oncology 327
- Cancer Research 175
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 162
Countries citing papers authored by Neda Khanlarkhani
This map shows the geographic impact of Neda Khanlarkhani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neda Khanlarkhani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neda Khanlarkhani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neda Khanlarkhani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neda Khanlarkhani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neda Khanlarkhani. The network helps show where Neda Khanlarkhani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neda Khanlarkhani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neda Khanlarkhani. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neda Khanlarkhani based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neda Khanlarkhani. Neda Khanlarkhani is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 115 | |
| 5 | 61 | |
| 6 | 143 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | Macrophage polarity in cancer: A reviewbreakdown → | 378 |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | Multipotent Stem Cell and Reproduction. | 7 |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | Multipotent Stem Cell and Current Application. | 67 |
| 18 | 200 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Neda Khanlarkhani
Neda Khanlarkhani is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers) and Testicular diseases and treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (131 citations), Biological Psychiatry (65 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (153 citations). Neda Khanlarkhani has collaborated with scholars based in Iran, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Keywan Mortezaee, Bagher Farhood, Nasser Hashemi Goradel, Masoud Najafi, Maryam Shabani Nashtaei, Adib Zendedel, Ensieh Salehi, Cordian Beyer, Amirhossein Sahebkar and Morteza Abouzaripour. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Cellular Physiology and Journal of Cellular Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.