Neala Hoad

750 citations
22 papers · 269 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Neala Hoad

20 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Neala Hoad
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 111
  • Internal Medicine 48
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 39
  • Emergency Medical Services 41
  • Clinical Psychology 104
Replace Shaw Natsui with:
Shaw Natsui United States
Jonathan D. Sonis United States
Edson Romano Brazil
Jason Bowman United States
Selena Au Canada
Nila Radhakrishnan United States
Luis García-Castrillo Riesgo Spain
Michael Ely United States
Patricia Schmuhl United States
Sheri M. Schaeffer United States
Neala Hoad relative to Shaw Natsui United States Shaw Natsui's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Shaw Natsui · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Neala Hoad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Neala Hoad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neala Hoad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neala Hoad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Neala Hoad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neala Hoad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neala Hoad. The network helps show where Neala Hoad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Neala Hoad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Neala Hoad Line = papers co-authored together Neala Hoad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200553
2 201446
3 202039
4 201827
5 202222
6 202020
7 20139
8 20228
9 20207
10 20216
11 20196
12 20206
13 20205
14 20235
15 20204
16 20232
17 20211
18 20121
19 20181
20 20171

About Neala Hoad

Neala Hoad is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Surgery, having authored 22 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (12 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (9 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), History of Medicine Studies (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (111 citations), Internal Medicine (48 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (39 citations), Emergency Medical Services (41 citations) and Clinical Psychology (104 citations). Neala Hoad has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Marilyn Swinton, France Clarke, Richard J. Cook, Meredith Vanstone, Erick Duan, Dan Perri, John Centofanti, Anne Boyle, Brittany B. Dennis and Kirsten M. Fiest. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, American Journal of Critical Care, Journal of Critical Care, BMC Palliative Care and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact