N.C. Helman

816 citations
21 papers · 602 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

N.C. Helman

19 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

N.C. Helman
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Biophysics 38
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 275
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 141
  • Molecular Biology 280
  • Aging 4
Replace Sohail Chatoor with:
Sohail Chatoor Netherlands
Artur Kaczmarczyk Netherlands
Mingchen Chen United States
Issa S. Moody United States
Esteban Mocskos Argentina
Jason Deich United States
Ravindra V. Dalal United States
Jaya G. Yodh United States
Hiroyuki Kabata Japan
N.C. Helman relative to Sohail Chatoor Netherlands Sohail Chatoor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sohail Chatoor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.C. Helman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.C. Helman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.C. Helman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.C. Helman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.C. Helman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.C. Helman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.C. Helman. The network helps show where N.C. Helman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.C. Helman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.C. Helman Line = papers co-authored together N.C. Helman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008270
2 200362
3 200355
4 200852
5 200745
6 200534
7 200221
8 200316
9 200711
10 200210
11 20036
12 20035
13 20033
14
Cavity Resonance Tuning of Asymmetric Fabry-Perot MQW Modulators Following Flip-Chip Bonding to Silicon CMOS
20023
15 20072
16
Optical Pump-Probe Latency Measurements of Silicon CMOS Optical Interconnects
20012
17 20032
18 20031
19 20031
20 20031

About N.C. Helman

N.C. Helman is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photonic and Optical Devices (18 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (16 papers), Optical Network Technologies (10 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (5 papers), Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (2 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (2 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (1 paper) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (38 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (275 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (141 citations), Molecular Biology (280 citations) and Aging (4 citations). N.C. Helman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Wendell A. Lim, Caleb J. Bashor, David A. B. Miller, Gordon A. Keeler, Diwakar Agarwal, Christof Debaes, Philip Lee, Paul J. Hung, D. P. Bour and Hugo Thienpont. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, BioTechniques, Electronics Letters, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact