Naven Chetty
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 0.5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Oncology top 10%
- Co-authors
- James NicklinAndreas ObermairKristy RobledoVal GebskiRobert L. ColemanTao ZhuXiaojian YanReitan Ribeiro
- Topics
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers)Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBiomaterials
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Naven Chetty
28 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.0k
- Reproductive Medicine 615
- Surgery 466
- Epidemiology 388
- Oncology 274
Countries citing papers authored by Naven Chetty
This map shows the geographic impact of Naven Chetty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naven Chetty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naven Chetty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naven Chetty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naven Chetty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naven Chetty. The network helps show where Naven Chetty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naven Chetty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naven Chetty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naven Chetty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naven Chetty. Naven Chetty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancerbreakdown → | 1108 |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | Applying the FIGO 2009 staging system for carcinoma of the vulva to patients previously staged with the FIGO 1988 staging system | 1 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 76 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Naven Chetty
Naven Chetty is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.0k citations), Reproductive Medicine (615 citations) and Epidemiology (388 citations). Naven Chetty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include James Nicklin, Andreas Obermair, Kristy Robledo, Val Gebski, Robert L. Coleman, Tao Zhu, Xiaojian Yan, Reitan Ribeiro, David Isla and Shuzhong Yao. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Biomaterials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.