Nathaniel W. Jenkins
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- James M. ParrishKern SinghNadia M. HrynewyczThomas S. BrundageYoungho SeoSpencer C. BehrCarina Marí ApariciMiguel Hernandez Pampaloni
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (46 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (22 papers)Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel W. Jenkins
65 papers receiving 930 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 380
- Surgery 367
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 201
- Pharmacology 177
- Artificial Intelligence 137
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel W. Jenkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel W. Jenkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel W. Jenkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel W. Jenkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel W. Jenkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel W. Jenkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel W. Jenkins. The network helps show where Nathaniel W. Jenkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel W. Jenkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel W. Jenkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel W. Jenkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel W. Jenkins. Nathaniel W. Jenkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Nathaniel W. Jenkins
Nathaniel W. Jenkins is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 68 papers that have together received 958 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (46 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (22 papers) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (47 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (380 citations) and Neurology (111 citations). Nathaniel W. Jenkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include James M. Parrish, Kern Singh, Nadia M. Hrynewycz, Thomas S. Brundage, Youngho Seo, Spencer C. Behr, Carina Marí Aparici, Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni, Timothy P. Copeland and Michael Kawczynski. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Radiology and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.