Nathaniel S. Lehrman
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology
- Philosophy top 10%
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineAmerican Journal of PsychiatryJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel S. Lehrman
21 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Clinical Psychology 111
- Psychiatry and Mental health 96
- General Health Professions 50
- Social Psychology 40
- Philosophy 39
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel S. Lehrman
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel S. Lehrman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel S. Lehrman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel S. Lehrman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel S. Lehrman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel S. Lehrman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel S. Lehrman. The network helps show where Nathaniel S. Lehrman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel S. Lehrman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel S. Lehrman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel S. Lehrman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel S. Lehrman. Nathaniel S. Lehrman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | The Bureaucratic Destruction of Patients' Faith in Their Doctors: Public Psychiatry's Negative Lessons for General Medicine. | 3 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Geriatric Rating Scale (GRS) 1970 | 1 |
| 9 | Human Sociobiology: Wilson's Fallacy. | 0 |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 89 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Nathaniel S. Lehrman
Nathaniel S. Lehrman is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (16 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (96 citations) and Clinical Psychology (111 citations). Nathaniel S. Lehrman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Plutchik, Hope R. Conte, Melissa Lieberman and Janet Grossman. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.