Nathaniel Poor

989 total citations
30 papers, 639 citations indexed

About

Nathaniel Poor is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathaniel Poor has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 639 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Communication and 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Nathaniel Poor's work include Digital Games and Media (13 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers). Nathaniel Poor is often cited by papers focused on Digital Games and Media (13 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (6 papers). Nathaniel Poor collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Israel. Nathaniel Poor's co-authors include Marko M. Škorić, Roei Davidson, Palakorn Achananuparp, Jing Jiang, Ee‐Peng Lim, Nojin Kwak, Kelly Bergstrom, Ann E. Williams, Rob Davidson and Allan M. Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as New Media & Society, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication and Information Communication & Society.

In The Last Decade

Nathaniel Poor

26 papers receiving 567 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nathaniel Poor United States	14	362	301	106	100	86	30	639
Hani Safadi United States	10	288 0.8×	233 0.8×	102 1.0×	79 0.8×	40 0.5×	28	691
Lian Jian United States	11	477 1.3×	298 1.0×	105 1.0×	125 1.3×	77 0.9×	23	731
Greg Elmer Canada	13	363 1.0×	295 1.0×	21 0.2×	54 0.5×	49 0.6×	43	712
Oliver Posegga Germany	12	212 0.6×	234 0.8×	48 0.5×	77 0.8×	55 0.6×	29	498
Jar‐Der Luo China	15	247 0.7×	89 0.3×	42 0.4×	63 0.6×	110 1.3×	42	721
Thomas Hildebrand Germany	7	671 1.9×	188 0.6×	217 2.0×	94 0.9×	28 0.3×	14	1.0k
Nicolas Pröllochs Germany	18	474 1.3×	206 0.7×	28 0.3×	366 3.7×	89 1.0×	49	856
Giles Moss United Kingdom	14	193 0.5×	259 0.9×	19 0.2×	58 0.6×	18 0.2×	37	564
Harsh Taneja United States	13	591 1.6×	521 1.7×	12 0.1×	75 0.8×	104 1.2×	29	803
Carsten Schwemmer Germany	11	315 0.9×	144 0.5×	14 0.1×	76 0.8×	24 0.3×	21	549

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Poor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Poor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Poor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Poor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Poor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Poor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Poor. The network helps show where Nathaniel Poor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel Poor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel Poor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel Poor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel Poor. Nathaniel Poor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bergstrom, Kelly & Nathaniel Poor. (2023). We have always been social: Comparing social expressiveness between single-player and multiplayer gamers. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds. 15(3). 247–266.

Poor, Nathaniel, Marko M. Škorić, & Cliff Lampe. (2022). Death of a child, birth of a guild: Factors aiding the rapid formation of online support communities. The Information Society. 38(3). 188–199. 6 indexed citations

Bergstrom, Kelly & Nathaniel Poor. (2022). Signaling the Intent to Change Online Communities: A Case From a Reddit Gaming Community. Social Media + Society. 8(2). 7 indexed citations

Poor, Nathaniel, et al.. (2021). Introduction to the Minitrack on Games and Gaming. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1 indexed citations

Bergstrom, Kelly & Nathaniel Poor. (2021). Reddit Gaming Communities During Times of Transition. Social Media + Society. 7(2). 18 indexed citations

Poor, Nathaniel. (2020). Open-Source’s Inspirations for Computational Social Science: Lessons from a Failed Analysis. Media and Communication. 8(3). 231–238. 1 indexed citations

Poor, Nathaniel. (2019). Building and sustaining large, long-term online communities. 1–12. 2 indexed citations

Davidson, Roei & Nathaniel Poor. (2018). Location, location, location: how digital platforms reinforce the importance of spatial proximity. Information Communication & Society. 22(10). 1464–1478. 19 indexed citations

Poor, Nathaniel & Roei Davidson. (2018). The Ethics of Using Hacked Data: Patreon’s Data Hack and Academic Data Standards. 6 indexed citations

10.

Poor, Nathaniel & Marko M. Škorić. (2014). Death of a Guild, Birth of a Network. Games and Culture. 9(3). 182–202. 20 indexed citations

11.

Poor, Nathaniel. (2014). Collaboration via Cooperation and Competition: Small Community Clustering in an MMO. 1695–1704. 10 indexed citations

12.

Davidson, Roei & Nathaniel Poor. (2014). The barriers facing artists’ use of crowdfunding platforms: Personality, emotional labor, and going to the well one too many times. New Media & Society. 17(2). 289–307. 74 indexed citations

13.

Poor, Nathaniel. (2013). Computer game modders’ motivations and sense of community: A mixed-methods approach. New Media & Society. 16(8). 1249–1267. 37 indexed citations

14.

Škorić, Marko M., Nathaniel Poor, Palakorn Achananuparp, Ee‐Peng Lim, & Jing Jiang. (2012). Tweets and Votes: A Study of the 2011 Singapore General Election. 2583–2591. 104 indexed citations

15.

Poor, Nathaniel. (2012). Digital Elves as a Racial Other in Video Games. Games and Culture. 7(5). 375–396. 18 indexed citations

16.

Škorić, Marko M., et al.. (2011). Online Organization of an Offline Protest: From Social to Traditional Media and Back. 1–8. 16 indexed citations

17.

Poor, Nathaniel. (2009). Global Citation Patterns of Open Access Communication Studies Journals: Pushing Beyond the Social Science Citation Index. International journal of communication. 3. 27. 4 indexed citations

18.

Davidson, Rob, Nathaniel Poor, & Allan M. Williams. (2009). Stratification and Global Elite Theory: A Cross-Cultural and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 21(2). 165–186. 13 indexed citations

19.

Kwak, Nojin, Nathaniel Poor, & Marko M. Škorić. (2006). Honey, I Shrunk the World! The Relation Between Internet Use and International Engagement. Mass Communication & Society. 9(2). 189–213. 39 indexed citations

20.

Kwak, Nojin, Marko M. Škorić, Ann E. Williams, & Nathaniel Poor. (2004). To Broadband or Not to Broadband: The Relationship Between High-speed Internet and Knowledge and Participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 48(3). 421–445. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact