Nathaniel Looker
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Tree-ring climate responses
- Cryospheric studies and observations
Papers in
-
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics 7
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 3
-
- Tree-ring climate responses 4
- Cryospheric studies and observations 2
- Co-authors
- Kelsey Jencso (4 shared papers)Jia Hu (4 shared papers)Justin T. Martin (4 shared papers)Zachary Hoylman (3 shared papers)Heidi Asbjornsen (4 shared papers)Z. Carter Berry (4 shared papers)F. Holwerda (3 shared papers)Chad Babcock (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Ecohydrology (1 paper)Journal of Hydrology (1 paper)Ecosystem Services (1 paper)Tree Physiology (1 paper)Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoAustria
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel Looker
12 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Global and Planetary Change 237
- Atmospheric Science 115
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 65
- Water Science and Technology 64
- Ecology 69
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Looker
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Looker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Looker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Looker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Looker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Looker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Looker. The network helps show where Nathaniel Looker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel Looker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 58 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 36 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 1 |
About Nathaniel Looker
Nathaniel Looker is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology and Soil Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (7 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (4 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (2 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (2 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (1 paper) and Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (237 citations), Atmospheric Science (115 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (65 citations), Water Science and Technology (64 citations) and Ecology (69 citations). Nathaniel Looker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Kelsey Jencso, Jia Hu, Justin T. Martin, Zachary Hoylman, Heidi Asbjornsen, Z. Carter Berry, F. Holwerda, Chad Babcock, Andrew O. Finley and Juan José Von Thaden. Their work appears in journals such as Ecohydrology, Journal of Hydrology, Ecosystem Services, Tree Physiology and Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.