Nathaniel J. Soper
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Oncology
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Gastroenterology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Judith M. ConnettGordon W. PhilpottMary K. ReinhardDaniel B. JonesJames W. FleshmanMark D. RodefeldRobert S. FigenshauParamjit S. Chandhoke
- Topics
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (5 papers)Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers)
- Journals
- Diseases of the Colon & RectumJournal of Gastrointestinal SurgeryJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel J. Soper
7 papers receiving 671 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Surgery 567
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 494
- Oncology 216
- Emergency Medicine 133
- Gastroenterology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel J. Soper
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel J. Soper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel J. Soper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel J. Soper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel J. Soper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel J. Soper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel J. Soper. The network helps show where Nathaniel J. Soper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel J. Soper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel J. Soper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel J. Soper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel J. Soper. Nathaniel J. Soper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 194 | |
| 7 | Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy The New 'Gold Standard'?breakdown → | 415 |
| 8 | Laparoscopic nephrectomy: a review of 16 cases. | 57 |
About Nathaniel J. Soper
Nathaniel J. Soper is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (5 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (494 citations), Emergency Medicine (133 citations) and Surgery (567 citations). Nathaniel J. Soper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Judith M. Connett, Gordon W. Philpott, Mary K. Reinhard, Daniel B. Jones, James W. Fleshman, Mark D. Rodefeld, Robert S. Figenshau, Paramjit S. Chandhoke, Mark P. Callery and Ralph V. Clayman. Their work appears in journals such as Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.