Nathan Ruhl

501 citations
18 papers · 347 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Ruhl

18 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Nathan Ruhl
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 156
  • Cell Biology 169
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 166
  • Physiology 15
  • Social Psychology 51
Replace Tolulope Omolayo Ariyomo with:
Tolulope Omolayo Ariyomo Nigeria
Tamal Roy India
Jennifer L. Snekser United States
Piyumika S. Suriyampola United States
Christina N. Toms United States
Jack S. Thomson United Kingdom
Samuel Péan France
Denis Meuthen Germany
Augusto Barbosa Brazil
Delia S. Shelton United States
Nathan Ruhl relative to Tolulope Omolayo Ariyomo Nigeria Tolulope Omolayo Ariyomo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Tolulope Omolayo Ariyomo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Ruhl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Ruhl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Ruhl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Ruhl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Ruhl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Ruhl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Ruhl. The network helps show where Nathan Ruhl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Ruhl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Ruhl Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Ruhl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 200594
2 201568
3 201041
4 200934
5 201526
6 200719
7 201215
8 202014
9 201513
10 20227
11 20097
12 20232
13
The Lotic-Lentic Gradient in Reservoirs and Estuaries
20122
14 20241
15 20191
16 20201
17 20141
18 20141

About Nathan Ruhl

Nathan Ruhl is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 18 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (5 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (3 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Water Quality and Pollution Assessment (2 papers) and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (156 citations), Cell Biology (169 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (166 citations), Physiology (15 citations) and Social Psychology (51 citations). Nathan Ruhl has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Scott P. McRobert, Jennifer L. Snekser, Gregory P. Way, Andrew M. Turner, Courtney Richmond, Nicole R. Sullivan, Willem M. Roosenburg, Serena Wright, Patrick W. Crumrine and Robert L. Spicer. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Processes, PeerJ, Lab Animal, Environmental Management and Ecological Processes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact