Nathan R. Foster
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 2%
- Co-authors
- Daniel J. SargentFrank A. SinicropeStephen N. ThibodeauRoberto LabiancaAmy J. FrenchSilvia MarsoniRafaela L. RegoBrian Kabat
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (38 papers)Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (26 papers)Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Nathan R. Foster
161 papers receiving 5.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Oncology 4.1k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.1k
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.3k
- Surgery 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan R. Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan R. Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan R. Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan R. Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan R. Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan R. Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan R. Foster. The network helps show where Nathan R. Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan R. Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan R. Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan R. Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan R. Foster. Nathan R. Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | Data Mining and Machine Learning to Improve Northern Florida’s Foster Care System | 1 |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | Defective Mismatch Repair As a Predictive Marker for Lack of Efficacy of Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Therapy in Colon Cancerbreakdown → | 1114 |
| 20 | 26 |
About Nathan R. Foster
Nathan R. Foster is a scholar working on Oncology, Otorhinolaryngology and Cancer Research, having authored 170 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (38 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (26 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (4.1k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (2.1k citations) and Cancer Research (997 citations). Nathan R. Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Sargent, Frank A. Sinicrope, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Roberto Labianca, Amy J. French, Silvia Marsoni, Rafaela L. Rego, Brian Kabat, Richard M. Goldberg and Steven R. Alberts. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Clinical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.