Nathan R. Daczko
- Geophysics top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Paleontology top 5%
- Geology top 2%
- Co-authors
- G. L. ClarkeJA HalpinKeith A. KlepeisSandra PiazoloJoanne M. WhittakerLuke MilanTimothy ChapmanI. C. W. Fitzsimons
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (110 papers)earthquake and tectonic studies (74 papers)High-pressure geophysics and materials (48 papers)
- Cited by
- GeophysicsGeologyPaleontology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nathan R. Daczko
112 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Geophysics 2.6k
- Artificial Intelligence 801
- Atmospheric Science 328
- Paleontology 261
- Geology 241
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan R. Daczko
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan R. Daczko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan R. Daczko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan R. Daczko more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan R. Daczko
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan R. Daczko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan R. Daczko. The network helps show where Nathan R. Daczko may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan R. Daczko
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan R. Daczko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan R. Daczko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan R. Daczko. Nathan R. Daczko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 92 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 162 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | Tectonic Evolution and Continental Fragmentation of the Southern West Australian Margin | 7 |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | Fragmentation Processes, Depositional Mechanisms and Lithification of Glassy Fragmental Rocks, Macquarie Island | 1 |
About Nathan R. Daczko
Nathan R. Daczko is a scholar working on Geophysics, Paleontology and Geology, having authored 118 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (110 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (74 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (48 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (2.6k citations), Geology (241 citations) and Paleontology (261 citations). Nathan R. Daczko has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. L. Clarke, JA Halpin, Keith A. Klepeis, Sandra Piazolo, Joanne M. Whittaker, Luke Milan, Timothy Chapman, I. C. W. Fitzsimons, Paul Mann and A. H. Allibone. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Earth and Planetary Science Letters and Geology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.