Nathan Lea

427 total citations
24 papers, 216 citations indexed

About

Nathan Lea is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan Lea has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 216 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 9 papers in Health Information Management and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Nathan Lea's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (10 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (9 papers) and Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (4 papers). Nathan Lea is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (10 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (9 papers) and Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (4 papers). Nathan Lea collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Italy. Nathan Lea's co-authors include Kerina Jones, Christine Dobbs, Graeme Laurie, David Ford, Dipak Kalra, Archana Tapuria, John Ainsworth, Martin Heaven, Pascal Coorevits and James A. Cunningham and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Journal of Medical Internet Research and International Journal of Medical Informatics.

In The Last Decade

Nathan Lea

21 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathan Lea United Kingdom 7 80 45 40 40 32 24 216
Melissa M. Goldstein United States 11 84 1.1× 28 0.6× 85 2.1× 66 1.6× 38 1.2× 27 283
Angelica Neisa Canada 10 109 1.4× 107 2.4× 22 0.6× 28 0.7× 60 1.9× 10 418
Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac Switzerland 8 49 0.6× 102 2.3× 34 0.8× 37 0.9× 30 0.9× 36 310
Lucy Hederman Ireland 10 35 0.4× 61 1.4× 37 0.9× 48 1.2× 16 0.5× 33 241
Brett Moran United States 9 54 0.7× 36 0.8× 53 1.3× 70 1.8× 26 0.8× 16 262
Rania Shibl Australia 8 35 0.4× 23 0.5× 35 0.9× 40 1.0× 21 0.7× 18 299
Bill Fitzgerald 6 52 0.7× 75 1.7× 27 0.7× 10 0.3× 42 1.3× 16 259
Andrea Martani Switzerland 10 126 1.6× 17 0.4× 61 1.5× 17 0.4× 43 1.3× 31 296
Deevakar Rogith United States 8 45 0.6× 41 0.9× 45 1.1× 33 0.8× 14 0.4× 21 218
Sebastian C. Semler Germany 7 86 1.1× 35 0.8× 45 1.1× 39 1.0× 7 0.2× 25 212

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Lea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Lea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Lea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Lea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Lea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Lea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Lea. The network helps show where Nathan Lea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Lea

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Lea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Lea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Lea. Nathan Lea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wood, Helen E., Chris Griffiths, Nathan Lea, et al.. (2023). Ethical and Information Governance Considerations for Promoting Digital Social Interventions in Primary Care. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25. e44886–e44886. 2 indexed citations
2.
Roguski, Łukasz, Xi Bai, Álex Handy, et al.. (2022). Deployment of a Free-Text Analytics Platform at a UK National Health Service Research Hospital: CogStack at University College London Hospitals. JMIR Medical Informatics. 10(8). e38122–e38122. 13 indexed citations
4.
Groenhof, T. Katrien J., Menno Mostert, Nathan Lea, et al.. (2022). How traditional informed consent impairs inclusivity in a learning healthcare system: lessons learned from the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 149. 190–194. 4 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Kerina, Elizabeth Ford, Nathan Lea, et al.. (2020). Toward the Development of Data Governance Standards for Using Clinical Free-Text Data in Health Research: Position Paper. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(6). e16760–e16760. 12 indexed citations
6.
Lea, Nathan, et al.. (2020). EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, Brexit and the Future of Transatlantic Data Flows. SSRN Electronic Journal.
7.
Tapuria, Archana, et al.. (2020). Development and Usability Evaluation of GreyMatters: A Memory Clinic Information System. 4(2). e149–e156. 1 indexed citations
8.
Jones, Kerina, et al.. (2019). Developing data governance standards for using free-text data in research (TexGov). International Journal for Population Data Science. 4(3). 1 indexed citations
9.
Floridi, Luciano, Ugo Pagallo, Burkhard Schäfer, et al.. (2018). Key Ethical Challenges in the European Medical Information Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal.
10.
Lea, Nathan, et al.. (2018). Between Scylla and Charybdis: Charting the Wicked Problem of Reusing Health Data for Clinical Research Informatics. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. 27(1). 170–176. 6 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Kerina, et al.. (2017). The other side of the coin: harm due to the non-use of health-related data. International Journal for Population Data Science. 1(1). 4 indexed citations
12.
Tapuria, Archana, et al.. (2017). Establishment of Requirements and Methodology for the Development and Implementation of GreyMatters, a Memory Clinic Information System. Studies in health technology and informatics. 235. 18–22. 1 indexed citations
13.
Lea, Nathan, Christine Dobbs, James A. Cunningham, et al.. (2016). Data Safe Havens and Trust: Toward a Common Understanding of Trusted Research Platforms for Governing Secure and Ethical Health Research. JMIR Medical Informatics. 4(2). e22–e22. 33 indexed citations
14.
Jones, Kerina, et al.. (2016). The other side of the coin: Harm due to the non-use of health-related data. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 97. 43–51. 77 indexed citations
15.
Lea, Nathan, et al.. (2016). Patterns: a simple but expressive data modelling formalism. Research Portal (King's College London). 4(1). 74–74. 3 indexed citations
16.
Tapuria, Archana, et al.. (2014). Development and evaluation of a memory clinic information system.. PubMed. 205. 106–10. 3 indexed citations
17.
Tapuria, Archana, Nathan Lea, Steve Iliffe, et al.. (2013). Clinical advantages of decision support tool for anticoagulation control. 101. 331–334. 3 indexed citations
18.
Lea, Nathan, et al.. (2009). Expression Of Security Policy In Medical Systems For Electronic Healthcare Records. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 3 indexed citations
19.
Kalra, D., et al.. (2008). Implementation of a query interface for a generic record server. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 77(11). 754–764. 5 indexed citations
20.
Lea, Nathan, et al.. (2008). Knowledge management for the protection of information in electronic medical records.. PubMed. 136. 685–90. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026