Nathan Kelso

401 total citations
10 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

Nathan Kelso is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan Kelso has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Nathan Kelso's work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers). Nathan Kelso is often cited by papers focused on Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers). Nathan Kelso collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Nathan Kelso's co-authors include Seung‐Kyun Lee, Alexander Pines, Whittier Myers, John Clarke, Andreas Trabesinger, Michael Hatridge, M. Mößle, Songi Han, B. ten Haken and R. McDermott and has published in prestigious journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Journal of Magnetic Resonance and Journal of Low Temperature Physics.

In The Last Decade

Nathan Kelso

8 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathan Kelso United States 4 239 224 164 102 29 10 301
Per E. Magnelind United States 12 235 1.0× 160 0.7× 105 0.6× 69 0.7× 71 2.4× 29 353
Panu T. Vesanen Finland 9 168 0.7× 191 0.9× 55 0.3× 39 0.4× 21 0.7× 20 291
H. Tang United States 7 528 2.2× 153 0.7× 93 0.6× 18 0.2× 4 0.1× 9 560
S. Stuiber Germany 8 184 0.8× 58 0.3× 28 0.2× 23 0.2× 25 0.9× 11 289
D. K. Walter United States 7 459 1.9× 190 0.8× 298 1.8× 26 0.3× 7 0.2× 9 486
C. H. Volk United States 11 390 1.6× 80 0.4× 136 0.8× 19 0.2× 10 0.3× 20 409
J.-L. Schenker Switzerland 7 254 1.1× 116 0.5× 21 0.1× 31 0.3× 3 0.1× 11 322
Anna M. Welz Germany 11 207 0.9× 393 1.8× 124 0.8× 56 0.5× 13 414
Paul J. Ganssle United States 5 285 1.2× 88 0.4× 274 1.7× 82 0.8× 4 0.1× 7 334
S. Ryu United States 8 62 0.3× 90 0.4× 35 0.2× 108 1.1× 182 6.3× 12 310

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Kelso

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Kelso's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Kelso with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Kelso more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Kelso

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Kelso. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Kelso. The network helps show where Nathan Kelso may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Kelso

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Kelso. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Kelso based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Kelso. Nathan Kelso is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Kelso, Nathan, et al.. (2009). Distortion-free magnetic resonance imaging in the zero-field limit. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 200(2). 285–290.
2.
Myers, Whittier, Seung‐Kyun Lee, Nathan Kelso, et al.. (2008). SQUID-Detected In Vivo MRI at Microtesla Magnetic Fields. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).
3.
Kelso, Nathan, et al.. (2006). SQUID-detected magnetic resonance imaging in zero static magnetic field. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 1 indexed citations
4.
Myers, Whittier, Seung‐Kyun Lee, Nathan Kelso, et al.. (2005). SQUID-Detected in vivo MRI at Microtesla Magnetic Fields. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 15(2). 757–760. 35 indexed citations
5.
Mößle, M., Songi Han, Whittier Myers, et al.. (2005). SQUID-detected microtesla MRI in the presence of metal. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 179(1). 146–151. 93 indexed citations
6.
Lee, Seung‐Kyun, et al.. (2004). SQUID-Detected MRI at 132 Microtesla with T1 Contrast Weighted at10 Microtelsa-300 mT. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 53. 3 indexed citations
7.
Lee, Seung‐Kyun, et al.. (2004). SQUID-Detected MRI at 132 Microtesla with T1 Contrast Weighted at 10 Microtelsa-300 mT. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 1 indexed citations
8.
Lee, Seung‐Kyun, Whittier Myers, Nathan Kelso, et al.. (2004). SQUID‐detected MRI at 132 μT with T1‐weighted contrast established at 10 μT–300 mT. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 53(1). 9–14. 109 indexed citations
9.
McDermott, R., Nathan Kelso, Seung‐Kyun Lee, et al.. (2004). SQUID-Detected Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Microtesla Magnetic Fields. Journal of Low Temperature Physics. 135(5-6). 793–821. 58 indexed citations
10.
Lee, Seung‐Kyun, R. McDermott, Nathan Kelso, et al.. (2003). Ultralow Frequency Magnetic Resonance Imaging with a SQUID-Based Receiver. University of Twente Research Information. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026