B. ten Haken
- Biomedical Engineering top 2%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 2%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Herman H.J. ten KateA. GodekeJ.J. RabbersD. C. LarbalestierKirsten M. PondmanMichel J. A. M. van PuttenR. McDermottJoost M. Klaase
- Topics
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (46 papers)Superconducting Materials and Applications (41 papers)Magnetic Properties and Applications (16 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of NeuroscienceApplied Physics Letters
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
B. ten Haken
119 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Biomedical Engineering 1.4k
- Condensed Matter Physics 1.1k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 564
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 506
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 354
Countries citing papers authored by B. ten Haken
This map shows the geographic impact of B. ten Haken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. ten Haken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. ten Haken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by B. ten Haken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. ten Haken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. ten Haken. The network helps show where B. ten Haken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. ten Haken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. ten Haken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. ten Haken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. ten Haken. B. ten Haken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in-vivo porcine model using a novel magnetic technique | 1 |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 113 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About B. ten Haken
B. ten Haken is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 123 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (46 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (41 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Applications (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (1.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.4k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (564 citations). B. ten Haken has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Herman H.J. ten Kate, A. Godeke, J.J. Rabbers, D. C. Larbalestier, Kirsten M. Pondman, Michel J. A. M. van Putten, R. McDermott, Joost M. Klaase, Seung‐Kyun Lee and John Clarke. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Applied Physics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.