Nathan Edmonds

11 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Nathan Edmonds
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 112
  • Developmental Biology 18
  • Ecology 195
  • Global and Planetary Change 135
  • Ecological Modeling 24
Replace Clifford L.K. Robinson with:
Clifford L.K. Robinson Canada
Gaea E. Crozier United States
Vânia Baptista Portugal
Paul D. van Ruth Australia
Dan Kehler Canada
Avery B. Paxton United States
Joy Young United States
Lavenia Ratnarajah Australia
Anders Bjørgesæter Norway
Jean-Marie Dominici France
Nathan Edmonds relative to Clifford L.K. Robinson Canada Clifford L.K. Robinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Clifford L.K. Robinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Edmonds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Edmonds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Edmonds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Edmonds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Edmonds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Edmonds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Edmonds. The network helps show where Nathan Edmonds may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Edmonds, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Edmonds Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Edmonds links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201284
2 201160
3 201646
4 201029
5 201126
6 202020
7 201915
8 201114
9
Horizon scanning for new invasive non-native animal species in England
200913
10 20107
11 20224

About Nathan Edmonds

Nathan Edmonds is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Aquatic Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4 papers), Marine and fisheries research (3 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (2 papers), International Maritime Law Issues (2 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (2 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (1 paper), Marine animal studies overview (1 paper) and Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (112 citations), Developmental Biology (18 citations), Ecology (195 citations), Global and Planetary Change (135 citations) and Ecological Modeling (24 citations). Nathan Edmonds has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Kuwait and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include David Maxwell, William D. Riley, B. Bendall, M. J. Ives, Ian R. Patmore, Carl D. Sayer, Ewan M. Shilland, Jan C. Axmacher, Denise Goldsmith and Gordon H. Copp. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Pollution Bulletin, Fisheries Management and Ecology, Sustainability, Aquatic Invasions and Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact