This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Doble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Doble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Doble more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Doble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Doble. The network helps show where Nathan Doble may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Doble
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Doble.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Doble based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Doble. Nathan Doble is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Choi, Stacey S., Elaine M. Wells-Gray, Heping Xu, et al.. (2019). Adaptive Optics OCT-Based Drusen Grading for Assessing Severity of Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 3465–3465.1 indexed citations
9.
Wells-Gray, Elaine M., Stacey S. Choi, & Nathan Doble. (2017). The effect of moderate myopia on rod and cone photoreceptor densities in human eyes using AO-SLO imaging. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 2494–2494.2 indexed citations
10.
Choi, S. S., et al.. (2010). Single Cell, in-vivo Imaging of Chick Retina With Adaptive Optics. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 2321–2321.1 indexed citations
Doble, Nathan & S. S. Choi. (2009). Widefield Imaging of the Human Retina Using Adaptive Optics. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 1062–1062.1 indexed citations
13.
Doble, Nathan, Carl J. Kempf, Michael A. Helmbrecht, & Austin Roorda. (2008). Closed Loop Adaptive Optics in the Human Eye Using a Segmented MEMS Deformable Mirror. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 4195–4195.2 indexed citations
14.
Doble, Nathan, et al.. (2007). The Design and Construction of an Adaptive Optics Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope for Focused Delivery of Laser Energy to the Eye. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 4243–4243.1 indexed citations
15.
Kempf, Carl J., Nathan Doble, & Michael A. Helmbrecht. (2007). Control of a MEMS Based Segmented Deformable Mirror for Vision Science Instrumentation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 4244–4244.1 indexed citations
16.
Zawadzki, Robert J., Steven M. Jones, Nathan Doble, et al.. (2006). In vivo High–Resolution Imaging of Retinal Dystrophy With Different Adaptive Optics Imaging Modalities. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 5660–5660.1 indexed citations
Choi, S. S., et al.. (2004). In vivo imaging of the human rod photoreceptor mosaic. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 2794–2794.7 indexed citations
19.
Doble, Nathan, S. S. Choi, & David R. Williams. (2004). Implications of infrared images of the living human cone mosaic for models of fundus reflectance. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 2790–2790.1 indexed citations
20.
Doble, Nathan, et al.. (2002). Low Cost, Compact Wavefront Correctors for Ophthalmic Instrumentation Equipped with Adaptive Optics. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 955–955.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.