Nathan D. Schley
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment top 1%
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert H. CrabtreeChristopher D. IncarvitoGregory C. FuGary W. BrudvigJames D. BlakemoreGaël UngGraham E. DobereinerOdile Eisenstein
- Topics
- Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (29 papers)Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (19 papers)Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (17 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical SocietyAngewandte Chemie International Edition
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nathan D. Schley
92 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Organic Chemistry 2.5k
- Inorganic Chemistry 1.7k
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 1.2k
- Materials Chemistry 1.2k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 494
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan D. Schley
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan D. Schley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan D. Schley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan D. Schley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan D. Schley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan D. Schley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan D. Schley. The network helps show where Nathan D. Schley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan D. Schley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan D. Schley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan D. Schley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan D. Schley. Nathan D. Schley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 74 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 63 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 64 |
About Nathan D. Schley
Nathan D. Schley is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 96 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (29 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (19 papers) and Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (440 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (1.7k citations) and Organic Chemistry (2.5k citations). Nathan D. Schley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Crabtree, Christopher D. Incarvito, Gregory C. Fu, Gary W. Brudvig, James D. Blakemore, Gaël Ung, Graham E. Dobereiner, Odile Eisenstein, G.W. Olack and Nilay Hazari. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.