Nathan A. Kaib
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Sean N. RaymondThomas QuinnAlessandro MorbidelliD. P. O’BrienMatthew S. ClementJohn ChambersK. J. WalshMartin J. Duncan
- Topics
- Astro and Planetary Science (51 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (41 papers)Planetary Science and Exploration (30 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceCanada
In The Last Decade
Nathan A. Kaib
48 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.8k
- Instrumentation 234
- Atmospheric Science 168
- Geophysics 79
- Ecology 51
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan A. Kaib
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan A. Kaib's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan A. Kaib with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan A. Kaib more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan A. Kaib
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan A. Kaib. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan A. Kaib. The network helps show where Nathan A. Kaib may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan A. Kaib
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan A. Kaib. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan A. Kaib based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan A. Kaib. Nathan A. Kaib is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | Inferring the primordial Pluto-mass population of the Kuiper belt | 1 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | A New Inner Oort Cloud Object | 0 |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 91 | |
| 16 | Ramifications of a Divot in the Kuiper Belt's Size Distribution | 0 |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 76 | |
| 19 | Using Known Long-Period Comets to Constrain the Inner Oort Cloud and Comet Shower Bombardment | 1 |
| 20 | 34 |
About Nathan A. Kaib
Nathan A. Kaib is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Atmospheric Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (51 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (41 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.8k citations), Instrumentation (234 citations) and Atmospheric Science (168 citations). Nathan A. Kaib has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Sean N. Raymond, Thomas Quinn, Alessandro Morbidelli, D. P. O’Brien, Matthew S. Clement, John Chambers, K. J. Walsh, Martin J. Duncan, Nicolas B. Cowan and Ramon Brasser. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.