Nathalie Boot

594 total citations
10 papers, 351 citations indexed

About

Nathalie Boot is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathalie Boot has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 351 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Nathalie Boot's work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers) and Mind wandering and attention (5 papers). Nathalie Boot is often cited by papers focused on Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (6 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers) and Mind wandering and attention (5 papers). Nathalie Boot collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Nathalie Boot's co-authors include Matthijs Baas, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, Simon van Gaal, Roshan Cools, Barbara Nevicka, Bernard A. Nijstad, Mischa de Rover, Stephen B. R. E. Brown, Sander Nieuwenhuis and Greg Hajcak and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, NeuroImage and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Nathalie Boot

10 papers receiving 338 citations

Peers

Nathalie Boot

ECP

CN

PMH

SP

CP

Aleksandra Gruszka Poland

Ping Wei China

Guikang Cao China

Bridget A. Smeekens United States

Shen Tu China

Walter Machado‐Pinheiro Brazil

Sietske W. Kleibeuker Netherlands

Sabine Wanmaker Netherlands

Jessica Aylward United Kingdom

Bart Aben Belgium

Aleksandra Gruszka Poland

Nathalie Boot

195 ×0.9

ECP

214 ×1.0

CN

23 ×0.4

PMH

77 ×1.4

SP

58 ×1.0

CP

Citations per year, relative to Nathalie Boot Nathalie Boot (= 1×) peers Aleksandra Gruszka

Countries citing papers authored by Nathalie Boot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathalie Boot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathalie Boot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathalie Boot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathalie Boot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathalie Boot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathalie Boot. The network helps show where Nathalie Boot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathalie Boot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathalie Boot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathalie Boot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathalie Boot. Nathalie Boot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Boot, Nathalie, et al.. (2021). Nature conservation in a digitalized world: echo chambers and filter bubbles. Ecology and Society. 26(3). 10 indexed citations

2.

Baas, Matthijs, Nathalie Boot, Simon van Gaal, Carsten K. W. De Dreu, & Roshan Cools. (2019). Methylphenidate does not affect convergent and divergent creative processes in healthy adults. NeuroImage. 205. 116279–116279. 10 indexed citations

3.

Baas, Matthijs, Bernard A. Nijstad, Jessie Koen, Nathalie Boot, & Carsten K. W. De Dreu. (2019). Vulnerability to psychopathology and creativity: The role of approach-avoidance motivation and novelty seeking.. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts. 14(3). 334–352. 16 indexed citations

4.

Boot, Nathalie, Matthijs Baas, Simon van Gaal, Roshan Cools, & Carsten K. W. De Dreu. (2017). Creative cognition and dopaminergic modulation of fronto-striatal networks: Integrative review and research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 78. 13–23. 110 indexed citations

5.

Boot, Nathalie, Barbara Nevicka, & Matthijs Baas. (2017). Creativity in ADHD: Goal-Directed Motivation and Domain Specificity. Journal of Attention Disorders. 24(13). 1857–1866. 31 indexed citations

6.

Boot, Nathalie, et al.. (2017). Widespread neural oscillations in the delta band dissociate rule convergence from rule divergence during creative idea generation. Neuropsychologia. 104. 8–17. 26 indexed citations

7.

Boot, Nathalie, Barbara Nevicka, & Matthijs Baas. (2017). Subclinical symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are associated with specific creative processes. Personality and Individual Differences. 114. 73–81. 35 indexed citations

8.

Baas, Matthijs, Bernard A. Nijstad, Nathalie Boot, & Carsten K. W. De Dreu. (2016). Mad genius revisited: Vulnerability to psychopathology, biobehavioral approach-avoidance, and creativity.. Psychological Bulletin. 142(6). 668–692. 69 indexed citations

9.

Dreu, Carsten K. W. De, Matthijs Baas, & Nathalie Boot. (2015). Oxytocin enables novelty seeking and creative performance through upregulated approach: evidence and avenues for future research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science. 6(5). 409–417. 17 indexed citations

10.

Rover, Mischa de, Stephen B. R. E. Brown, Nathalie Boot, et al.. (2011). Beta receptor-mediated modulation of the late positive potential in humans. Psychopharmacology. 219(4). 971–979. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact