Natasha Wunsch

64 total papers · 566 total citations
23 papers, 262 citations indexed

About

Natasha Wunsch is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Development. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Wunsch has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 262 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Development. Recurrent topics in Natasha Wunsch's work include European Union Policy and Governance (15 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (6 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers). Natasha Wunsch is often cited by papers focused on European Union Policy and Governance (15 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (6 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers). Natasha Wunsch collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, France and United Kingdom. Natasha Wunsch's co-authors include Solveig Richter, Marie‐Ève Bélanger, Theresa Gessler, Mihail Chiru, Adam Fagan, Daniel Naurin, Ulrich Sedelmeier, Michael Blauberger and Thomas H. Hunter and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Political Science, European Journal of Political Research and Journal of European Public Policy.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Wunsch

21 papers receiving 241 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natasha Wunsch 203 82 36 35 21 23 262
Solveig Richter 181 0.9× 113 1.4× 26 0.7× 41 1.2× 31 1.5× 19 241
Spyros Economides 196 1.0× 151 1.8× 16 0.4× 22 0.6× 42 2.0× 29 290
Julian Bergmann 188 0.9× 99 1.2× 26 0.7× 57 1.6× 5 0.2× 27 239
Hanno Scholtz 178 0.9× 106 1.3× 34 0.9× 44 1.3× 5 0.2× 19 241
Dimitar Bechev 234 1.2× 81 1.0× 26 0.7× 15 0.4× 31 1.5× 31 292
Sueo Sudo 207 1.0× 121 1.5× 34 0.9× 73 2.1× 18 0.9× 25 269
Petr Drulák 220 1.1× 112 1.4× 21 0.6× 16 0.5× 15 0.7× 33 296
Jeanne L. Wilson 167 0.8× 124 1.5× 14 0.4× 24 0.7× 6 0.3× 20 228
Andrew Yeo 156 0.8× 131 1.6× 14 0.4× 31 0.9× 19 0.9× 37 221
Lonny E. Carlile 162 0.8× 149 1.8× 36 1.0× 17 0.5× 34 1.6× 22 297

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Wunsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Wunsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Wunsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Wunsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Wunsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Wunsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Wunsch. The network helps show where Natasha Wunsch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Wunsch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Wunsch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Wunsch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Wunsch. Natasha Wunsch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026