Natasha Van Borek

18 total papers · 521 total citations
14 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Natasha Van Borek is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Van Borek has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Infectious Diseases and 4 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Natasha Van Borek's work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers). Natasha Van Borek is often cited by papers focused on HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (4 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (3 papers). Natasha Van Borek collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and Kenya. Natasha Van Borek's co-authors include Will Small, Thomas Kerr, Nadia Fairbairn, Evan Wood, Mia L. van der Kop, Kirsten Smillie, Richard Lester, Darlene Taylor, Jane A. Buxton and Neora Pick and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health and Child Abuse & Neglect.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Van Borek

13 papers receiving 352 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natasha Van Borek 213 136 127 107 49 14 366
Jennie L. Harris 175 0.8× 107 0.8× 124 1.0× 44 0.4× 27 0.6× 13 362
Victor Akelo 163 0.8× 55 0.4× 157 1.2× 56 0.5× 59 1.2× 31 332
Kate Jongbloed 171 0.8× 124 0.9× 81 0.6× 64 0.6× 77 1.6× 32 354
Christopher Obong’o 257 1.2× 82 0.6× 181 1.4× 30 0.3× 71 1.4× 20 364
Abigail L. Muldoon 182 0.9× 97 0.7× 234 1.8× 24 0.2× 49 1.0× 16 399
Rob Stephenson 263 1.2× 139 1.0× 188 1.5× 36 0.3× 68 1.4× 12 378
Thierry Fortune 282 1.3× 67 0.5× 196 1.5× 29 0.3× 90 1.8× 13 391
Jessica S. Grignon 196 0.9× 120 0.9× 195 1.5× 38 0.4× 42 0.9× 20 370
Krista Jones 155 0.7× 87 0.6× 30 0.2× 88 0.8× 70 1.4× 26 356
Samuel Muhula 143 0.7× 83 0.6× 127 1.0× 32 0.3× 23 0.5× 28 344

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Van Borek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Van Borek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Van Borek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Van Borek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Van Borek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Van Borek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Van Borek. The network helps show where Natasha Van Borek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Van Borek

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Van Borek. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Van Borek based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Van Borek. Natasha Van Borek is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026