Natasha Sacks
- Mechanical Engineering top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Mechanics of Materials top 5%
- Aerospace Engineering top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- А.M. VenterSisa PityanaAlan ShemiSehliselo NdlovuOluseyi Philip OladijoLesley CornishG. AkdoganS. Luyckx
- Topics
- Advanced materials and composites (37 papers)Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (15 papers)Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (14 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Alloys and CompoundsThin Solid Films
- Partner nations
- South AfricaAustraliaGermany
In The Last Decade
Natasha Sacks
57 papers receiving 822 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Mechanical Engineering 710
- Materials Chemistry 208
- Mechanics of Materials 207
- Aerospace Engineering 204
- Biomedical Engineering 129
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Sacks
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Sacks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Sacks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Sacks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Sacks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Sacks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Sacks. The network helps show where Natasha Sacks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Sacks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Sacks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Sacks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Sacks. Natasha Sacks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 44 | |
| 18 | Functional Performance And Machinability Of Titanium Alloys For Medical Implants: A Review | 4 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Natasha Sacks
Natasha Sacks is a scholar working on Ceramics and Composites, Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 61 papers that have together received 860 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced materials and composites (37 papers), Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes (15 papers) and Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanical Engineering (710 citations), Ceramics and Composites (105 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (207 citations). Natasha Sacks has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include А.M. Venter, Sisa Pityana, Alan Shemi, Sehliselo Ndlovu, Oluseyi Philip Oladijo, Lesley Cornish, G. Akdogan, S. Luyckx, D.N.J. Els and S.M. Bradshaw. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Alloys and Compounds and Thin Solid Films.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.