Natasha Mhatre

473 total citations
29 papers, 278 citations indexed

About

Natasha Mhatre is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Developmental Biology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Mhatre has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 278 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 14 papers in Developmental Biology and 10 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Natasha Mhatre's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (16 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (14 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers). Natasha Mhatre is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (16 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (14 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers). Natasha Mhatre collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and India. Natasha Mhatre's co-authors include Rohini Balakrishnan, Daniel Robert, Fernando Montealegre‐Z, Andrew C. Mason, Gerald S. Pollack, Erin E. Brandt, Damian O. Elias, Christopher Bergevin, Manjari Jain and Jayne E. Yack and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Mhatre

27 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natasha Mhatre Canada 11 211 88 88 43 25 29 278
Thorin Jonsson United Kingdom 11 272 1.3× 74 0.8× 119 1.4× 42 1.0× 25 1.0× 23 326
Stefan Schöneich Germany 10 273 1.3× 82 0.9× 126 1.4× 117 2.7× 29 1.2× 16 333
Gil Menda United States 9 144 0.7× 38 0.4× 95 1.1× 113 2.6× 17 0.7× 10 275
Christophe A. H. Bousquet France 8 151 0.7× 61 0.7× 53 0.6× 14 0.3× 58 2.3× 15 248
Kristin Rohrseitz Germany 9 288 1.4× 61 0.7× 243 2.8× 77 1.8× 33 1.3× 11 486
R. R. Hoy United States 11 345 1.6× 105 1.2× 147 1.7× 117 2.7× 32 1.3× 15 484
Benedict G. Hogan United States 9 191 0.9× 36 0.4× 43 0.5× 33 0.8× 61 2.4× 13 267
Madeline Girard United States 8 282 1.3× 63 0.7× 177 2.0× 92 2.1× 29 1.2× 10 370
Hans-Ulrich Kleindienst Germany 12 351 1.7× 118 1.3× 119 1.4× 220 5.1× 49 2.0× 15 462
Anand Krishnan India 13 173 0.8× 113 1.3× 91 1.0× 69 1.6× 144 5.8× 25 359

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Mhatre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Mhatre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Mhatre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Mhatre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Mhatre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Mhatre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Mhatre. The network helps show where Natasha Mhatre may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Mhatre

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Mhatre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Mhatre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Mhatre. Natasha Mhatre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Weiner, R., Sara E. Duke, Guido Simonelli, Nathan W. Bailey, & Natasha Mhatre. (2025). Reliable reconstruction of cricket song from biophysical models and preserved specimens. Royal Society Open Science. 12(7). 251005–251005. 1 indexed citations
2.
Brandt, Erin E., et al.. (2023). The ground offers acoustic efficiency gains for crickets and other calling animals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(46). e2302814120–e2302814120. 4 indexed citations
3.
Mamiya, Akira, Anne Sustar, Igor Siwanowicz, et al.. (2023). Biomechanical origins of proprioceptor feature selectivity and topographic maps in the Drosophila leg. Neuron. 111(20). 3230–3243.e14. 9 indexed citations
4.
Mhatre, Natasha, et al.. (2022). A numerical approach to investigating the mechanisms behind tonotopy in the bush-cricket inner-ear. Frontiers in Insect Science. 2. 957385–957385. 2 indexed citations
5.
Brandt, Erin E., et al.. (2021). Jump takeoff in a small jumping spider. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 207(2). 153–164. 9 indexed citations
6.
Bergevin, Christopher, Chandan Narayan, Natasha Mhatre, et al.. (2020). Overtone focusing in biphonic tuvan throat singing. eLife. 9. 8 indexed citations
7.
Bergevin, Christopher, Andrew C. Mason, & Natasha Mhatre. (2020). Evidence supporting synchrony between two active ears due to interaural coupling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 147(1). EL25–EL31. 1 indexed citations
8.
Mhatre, Natasha, et al.. (2018). In that vein: inflated wing veins contribute to butterfly hearing. Biology Letters. 14(10). 20180496–20180496. 6 indexed citations
9.
Mhatre, Natasha. (2018). Tree cricket baffles are manufactured tools. Ethology. 124(9). 691–693. 5 indexed citations
10.
Mhatre, Natasha & Daniel Robert. (2018). The Drivers of Heuristic Optimization in Insect Object Manufacture and Use. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1015–1015. 3 indexed citations
11.
Bergevin, Christopher, Natasha Mhatre, & Andrew C. Mason. (2018). Comparing external tympanum vibration and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. AIP conference proceedings. 3 indexed citations
12.
Mhatre, Natasha, et al.. (2017). Tree crickets optimize the acoustics of baffles to exaggerate their mate-attraction signal. eLife. 6. 21 indexed citations
13.
Mhatre, Natasha, Gerald S. Pollack, & Andrew C. Mason. (2016). Stay tuned: active amplification tunes tree cricket ears to track temperature-dependent song frequency. Biology Letters. 12(4). 20160016–20160016. 8 indexed citations
14.
Mhatre, Natasha. (2014). Active amplification in insect ears: mechanics, models and molecules. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 201(1). 19–37. 19 indexed citations
15.
Mhatre, Natasha & Daniel Robert. (2013). A Tympanal Insect Ear Exploits a Critical Oscillator for Active Amplification and Tuning. Current Biology. 23(19). 1952–1957. 25 indexed citations
16.
Mhatre, Natasha, Fernando Montealegre‐Z, Rohini Balakrishnan, & Daniel Robert. (2012). Changing resonator geometry to boost sound power decouples size and song frequency in a small insect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(22). E1444–52. 34 indexed citations
17.
Mhatre, Natasha, et al.. (2012). Low pass filters and differential tympanal tuning in a paleotropical bushcricket with an unusually low frequency call. Journal of Experimental Biology. 216(Pt 5). 777–87. 11 indexed citations
18.
Mhatre, Natasha, Fernando Montealegre‐Z, Rohini Balakrishnan, & Daniel Robert. (2009). Mechanical response of the tympanal membranes of the tree cricket Oecanthus henryi. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 195(5). 453–462. 16 indexed citations
19.
Mhatre, Natasha. (2009). Secret Lives: Biodiversity of the Indian Institute of Science campus. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 3 indexed citations
20.
Mhatre, Natasha & Rohini Balakrishnan. (2008). Predicting acoustic orientation in complex real-world environments. Journal of Experimental Biology. 211(17). 2779–2785. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026